atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Differential equations and PDEs

Solving Poisson Equations using Neural Walk-on-Spheres

ICML 2024 · Probabilistic and scientific modeling › Differential equations and PDEs · approach: Neural operators for general geometries · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes Neural Walk-on-Spheres (NWoS), a gradient-free neural loss for high-dimensional Poisson equations built from recursive Walk-on-Spheres estimates, with a buffer, control variates, and boundary loss.

Problem

Solving high-dimensional Poisson equations on general domains with neural networks; existing PINN, Deep Ritz, BSDE and diffusion losses suffer from high cost, bias, instability, or slow propagation of boundary information.

Approach

Derive a variational loss whose target is a single Walk-on-Spheres trajectory (recursive sphere sampling plus Green's-function source terms), so the network regresses to an unbiased-up-to-epsilon estimate without any spatial derivatives; uses a buffer of cached WoS estimates with partial replacement, control variates from the network gradient, and optional neural-network evaluation at truncated wa

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use NWoS instead of Diffusion lossPoisson solvers · Laplace (10d)relative L2-error: 1.57e^{-4}\pm7.74e^{-6} -> 4.29e^{-5}\pm2.02e^{-6}Helped
use NWoS instead of Neural CachePoisson solvers · Committor (10d)relative L2-error: 1.26^{-3}\pm5.82e^{-5} -> 6.56e^{-4}\pm2.42e^{-5}Helped
use NWoS instead of Deep RitzPoisson solvers · Poisson Rect. (10d)relative L2-error: 1.06e^{-2}\pm6.20e^{-4} -> 2.60e^{-3}\pm9.99e^{-5}Helped
use NWoS instead of Diffusion lossPoisson solvers · Poisson (50d)relative L2-error: 5.96e^{-4}\pm1.06e^{-5} -> 4.82e^{-4}\pm1.32e^{-5}Helped
replace Projection with NWoSPoisson solver · Poisson (100d)relative L2-error: 2.92e^{-4}\pm5.17e^{-7} -> 6.22e^{-4}\pm1.18e^{-5}Hurt
replace Projection with NWoSPoisson solver · Poisson (500d)relative L2-error: 1.19e^{-5}\pm1.67e^{-8} -> 9.14^{-3}\pm6.31e^{-5}Hurt
add control variate (ablation)NWoS · PDE-constrained optimizationrelative L2-error: 2.89\% -> 1.72\%Helped
add neural network terminal evaluation for walks not converged after K steps (ablation)NWoS · PDE-constrained optimizationrelative L2-error: 2.89\% -> 1.70\%Helped
add control variate and neural network terminal evaluation (ablation)NWoS · PDE-constrained optimizationrelative L2-error: 2.89\% -> 1.30\%Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Benchmarks: Laplace (10d) Committor (10d) Poisson rectangular annulus (10d) Poisson (50d) Poisson (100d) Poisson (500d) PDE-constrained optimization (2D Poisson control)

Metrics: relative L2 error training time GPU memory

Baselines: PINN Deep Ritz Diffusion loss Neural Cache WoS Projection

Builds on: Walk-on-Spheres Deep Ritz method Feynman-Kac / BSDE losses diffusion loss Neural Cache

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy