atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Treatment effects

Inverse-Variance Weighting for Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects

ICML 2024 · Probabilistic and scientific modeling › Treatment effects · approach: Meta-learners and partial identification

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Argues that the choice of weights, not the pseudo-outcome transformation, drives performance in weighted pseudo-outcome regression for CATE estimation, showing R-Learning uses inverse-variance weights and deriving oracle-efficient convergence rates for IVW-based DR-learners.

Problem

CATE estimation via pseudo-outcome regression (POR) is unstable when propensity scores are extreme, and prior comparisons focused on pseudo-outcome transformations rather than the regression weights.

Approach

Shows that R-Learning is an implicit weighted POR with inverse-variance weights (approximately (A-pi)^2 or pi(1-pi)), which stabilize the pseudo-outcome regression without reintroducing confounding since the CATE is conditional on X; proposes applying such weights to DR and covariance-based pseudo-outcomes and derives convergence rates for the resulting local polynomial estimator.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use R-Learner weights (A − π̂(X))² instead of uniform weights (ablation)Spline-based pseudo-outcome regression predicting fU,θ · Simulation FrMSE: 1.38 -> 0.288Helped
Use inverse-variance weights instead of uniform weights (ablation)Pseudo-outcome regression across simulation settings A–F · Simulations A–Fmean squared errorHelped
Use a T-Learner instead of weighted pseudo-outcome regressionCATE estimation · Simulations A–Cmean squared errorHurt
Use a T-Learner instead of weighted pseudo-outcome regressionCATE estimation · Simulations D–Fmean squared errorNo clear effect

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: simulated data (settings A-F from Nie & Wager 2020 and Kennedy 2023)

Benchmarks: simulation settings A-F

Metrics: mean squared error (log scale) rMSE convergence rate

Baselines: U-Learner T-Learner R-Learner unweighted DR-Learner HORL

Builds on: R-Learner DR-Learner U-Learner T-Learner higher-order R-Learner

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy