atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Treatment effects

Collaborative Heterogeneous Causal Inference Beyond Meta-analysis

ICML 2024 · Probabilistic and scientific modeling › Treatment effects · approach: Proximal and deep causal effect estimation · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes Clb-IPW and Clb-AIPW estimators that collaboratively combine heterogeneous sites by weighting propensity models jointly, avoiding meta-analysis, with a federated outcome-model training algorithm.

Problem

Causal inference (ATE estimation) across heterogeneous data sites whose covariate distributions differ from the target population, where existing methods reduce to meta-analysis of per-site estimates and fail when a site cannot cover the full population.

Approach

Instead of re-weighting each site to the target and then meta-analysing, directly use the weighted mean of all sites' selection propensity models for each individual's inverse weight, so each site's estimator is inconsistent alone but the sum across sites is consistent; extends to a decoupled AIPW with a public census covariate set and a federated FedAvg outcome model.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use collaborative IPW instead of Meta-IPW as site heterogeneity increasesATE estimation · Synthetic dataMSEHelped
Use Clb-IPW instead of Meta-IPWATE estimation · Synthetic datavarianceHelped
Use AIPW with a correctly specified outcome model when the propensity score model is misspecifiedAIPW estimators · Synthetic dataconsistencyHelped
Use AIPW with a correctly specified propensity score model when the outcome model is misspecifiedAIPW estimators · Synthetic dataconsistencyHelped
Use AIPW when both propensity score and outcome models are misspecifiedAIPW estimators · Synthetic dataconsistencyHurt
Use Clb-IPW or AIPW instead of Meta-IPW or Meta-AIPWATE estimation · Two fake-news studiesestimated effect sizeMixed

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: synthetic Gaussian covariate data COVID-19 fake news sharing nudge studies

Metrics: mean squared error 95% confidence interval coverage/width

Baselines: Meta-IPW Meta-AIPW exponential tilting density ratio estimation K-NN density ratio estimation

Builds on: Meta-analysis (inverse-variance weighting) augmented inverse propensity weighting double machine learning FedAvg

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy