atlas

Research map / Reinforcement learning / MDPs and planning

Target Networks and Over-parameterization Stabilize Off-policy Bootstrapping with Function Approximation

ICML 2024 · Reinforcement learning › MDPs and planning · approach: Offline RL sample complexity · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Shows that combining a target network with over-parameterized linear TD yields convergence for off-policy bootstrapping, including with normalized importance sampling on trajectory data, and extends to Q-learning.

Problem

Off-policy bootstrapped value estimation with function approximation (the deadly triad) diverges, and over-parameterization alone or target networks alone do not guarantee convergence.

Approach

Combine a hard-updated target network with over-parameterized linear features (d > number of observed state-action pairs) so the TD fixed point is independent of the data distribution; the target-network update makes the iteration contractive, and NIS-corrected next-action transitions on full trajectories remove the remaining condition.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
add a target network to TDTD · Two-state counterexampleconvergence rate metric: 1.12 -> 1- 3.8\mathrm{e}{-3}Helped
add a target network to over-parameterized TD (ablation)OTD · Baird's counterexamplevalue prediction errorHelped
use over-parameterization without a target network (ablation)TD · Baird's counterexampleconvergenceHurt
use a target network without over-parameterization (ablation)TD · off-policy expected updatesconvergenceHurt
use ordinary importance sampling instead of normalized importance sampling (ablation)OTTD with trajectory data · Four Roomvalue prediction errorHurt
increase the dataset size with NIS correction (ablation)OTTD with NIS correction · Four Roomvalue prediction errorHelped
use NIS correction instead of sampling the next action from the target policy (ablation)OTTD with trajectory data · Four Roomvalue prediction errorNo clear effect

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Baird's counterexample Four-room task (episodic, random behaviour policy)

Benchmarks: Baird's counterexample Four-room task Two-state counterexample

Metrics: maximal value prediction error infinity-norm value error EMSBE convergence rate metric lim ||C||^(1/t)

Baselines: TD over-parameterized TD residual minimization Baird RM GTD2 TDC LSTD

Builds on: temporal difference learning residual minimization Q-learning normalized importance sampling

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy