atlas

Research map / Optimization / Nonconvex and smooth optimization

Faster Adaptive Decentralized Learning Algorithms

ICML 2024 · Optimization › Nonconvex and smooth optimization · approach: Complexity of nonconvex first-order methods · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes AdaMDOS and AdaMDOF, adaptive momentum-based decentralized algorithms with gradient tracking for nonconvex stochastic and finite-sum optimization, claiming near-optimal sample complexities of Õ(ε^-3) and O(√n ε^-2).

Problem

Decentralized nonconvex stochastic and finite-sum optimization with adaptive learning rates, where prior adaptive decentralized methods suffer high sample and communication complexity (O(ε^-4)).

Approach

Combines STORM-style (AdaMDOS) or ZeroSARAH-style (AdaMDOF) variance-reduced momentum with gradient tracking and a unified adaptive matrix (Adam-like or Barzilai-Borwein-like) applied in a decentralized setting.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use AdaMDOS instead of existing adaptive decentralized stochastic algorithmsAdaptive decentralized stochastic optimization · Nonconvex stochastic optimizationsample complexity: O(\epsilon^{-4}) -> \tilde{O}(\epsilon^{-3})Helped
Use AdaMDOS instead of existing adaptive decentralized stochastic algorithmsAdaptive decentralized stochastic optimization · Nonconvex stochastic optimizationcommunication complexity: O(\epsilon^{-4}) -> O(\epsilon^{-3})Helped
Use AdaMDOS rather than the compared adaptive methodsAdaptive decentralized optimization · w8a and covertype; ring and 3-regular networksstationary gapHelped
Use AdaMDOF rather than the compared adaptive methodsAdaptive decentralized optimization · w8a and covertype; ring and 3-regular networksstationary gapNo clear effect
Use AdaMDOS rather than the compared adaptive methodsAdaptive decentralized CNN training · MNIST; ring and 3-regular networkstraining lossHelped
Use AdaMDOF rather than the compared adaptive methodsAdaptive decentralized CNN training · MNIST; ring and 3-regular networkstraining lossNo clear effect
Use AdaMDOS rather than DADAM and D²Decentralized ResNet-18 training · Tiny-ImageNet; ring and 3-regular networkstest accuracyMixed

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: w8a covertype MNIST Tiny-ImageNet

Benchmarks: w8a covertype MNIST Tiny-ImageNet

Metrics: stationary gap training loss training accuracy test accuracy

Baselines: DADAM DAMSGrad DAdaGrad D-PSGD D^2

Builds on: STORM ZeroSARAH gradient tracking Adam D-PSGD

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy