atlas

Research map / Time series / Causal and generative time series

Log Neural Controlled Differential Equations: The Lie Brackets Make A Difference

ICML 2024 · Time series › Causal and generative time series · approach: Neural differential equations · 2 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces Log-NCDEs, which apply the Log-ODE method with Lie brackets of a neural CDE vector field (depth-2, Lip(gamma) regularised FCNN) to train NCDEs, outperforming NCDEs, NRDEs, LRU, S5, S6 and MAMBA on UEA and PPG-DaLiA.

Problem

Neural CDEs lag state-of-the-art sequence models (S5, LRU, MAMBA) on long multivariate time series classification and regression, and NRDEs approximate the Lie bracket structure only via a costly wide neural network output.

Approach

Construct the Log-ODE vector field from iterated Lie brackets of a NCDE's own neural vector field f_theta (rather than a wide network output as in NRDEs), enforce Lip(gamma) regularity via spectral-norm-style weight penalty, and compute brackets efficiently with batched Jacobian-vector products.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Construct the Log-ODE vector field using iterated Lie brackets of the NCDE vector field instead of parameterizing it as a neural networkNRDE · UEA-MTSCA averageaccuracy: 60.6 -> 64.3Helped
Construct the Log-ODE vector field using iterated Lie brackets of the NCDE vector field instead of parameterizing it as a neural networkNRDE · PPG-DaLiA testMSE (× 10⁻²): 9.90\pm 0.97 -> 9.56 \pm 0.59Helped
Use Log-NCDE rather than NCDENCDE · UEA-MTSCA averagerun time (s): 6649.91 -> 2128.32Helped
Use Log-NCDE rather than NRDENRDE · UEA-MTSCA averagerun time (s): 7284.20 -> 2128.32Helped
Use Log-NCDE rather than NRDENRDE · UEA-MTSCA datasetsaccuracyHelped
Use Log-NCDE rather than NCDENCDE · EigenWorms testaccuracy: 75.0 \pm 3.9 -> 85.6 \pm 5.1Helped
Use Log-NCDE rather than NRDENRDE · EthanolConcentration testaccuracy: 25.3 \pm 1.8 -> 34.4 \pm 6.4Helped
Use Log-NCDE rather than LRULRU · Heartbeat testaccuracy: 78.4 \pm 6.7 -> 75.2 \pm 4.6Hurt
Use Log-NCDE rather than S5S5 · SelfRegulationSCP1 testaccuracy: 89.9 \pm 4.6 -> 83.1 \pm 2.8Hurt
Use Log-NCDE rather than LRULRU · EigenWorms testaccuracy: 87.8 \pm 2.8 -> 85.6 \pm 5.1Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Toy dataset (synthetic, 100k series) UEA-MTSCA subset: EigenWorms, EthanolConcentration, Heartbeat, MotorImagery, SelfRegulationSCP1, SelfRegulationSCP2 PPG-DaLiA

Benchmarks: UEA-MTSCA (six datasets) PPG-DaLiA Toy signature-classification dataset

Metrics: test accuracy mean squared error average rank GPU memory run time

Baselines: NCDE NRDE LRU S5 S6 MAMBA

Builds on: neural rough differential equations neural controlled differential equations S5 linear recurrent unit MAMBA

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy