AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Prediction and decision losses

Recovering Top-Two Answers and Confusion Probability in Multi-Choice Crowdsourcing

ICML 2023 · Learning theory and algorithms › Prediction and decision losses · approach: Adaptive testing and experiments · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Train with top-two soft labels instead of hard labelsVGG-19 and ResNet18 · CIFAR10Htest accuracy: 77.64±1.54% -> 79.20±1.04%; 76.49%±1.80% -> 80.58%±2.36%Helped
Train with top-two labels instead of full label distributionsVGG-19 and ResNet18 · CIFAR10Htest accuracy: 78.66±0.97% -> 79.20±1.04%; 80.93%±2.66% -> 80.58%±2.36%Mixed
Train with top-two labels instead of full label distributions under added spammer responsesVGG-19 and ResNet18 · CIFAR10H, spammer ratios 0.1–0.5test accuracy: At 0.1, ResNet18: 80.73±0.79% -> 80.18±1.30%; VGG-19: 78.67±1.45% -> 78.90±0.72%. At 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5, top-two valMixed

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy