atlas

Research map / Adversarial robustness and security / Certified and empirical robustness

Robust Explanation for Free or At the Cost of Faithfulness

ICML 2023 · Adversarial robustness and security › Certified and empirical robustness · approach: Robustness to poisoning and multiple attacks

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
robust training of the model (instead of non-robust)Gradient, GI, IG, SmoothGrad, LIME, SHAP explanations · CIFAR10, ResNet18 and other backboneslocal Lipschitz of explanation (lower = more robust)Helped
increase SmoothGrad noise level sigma (smoothing the model with Gaussian kernel) (ablation)SmoothGrad on non-robust models · CIFAR10, four modelslocal Lipschitz of explanation (lower = more robust)Helped
increase SmoothGrad noise level sigma (ablation)SmoothGrad on non-robust models · CIFAR10, five modelsfaithfulness (similarity to marginal contributions)Mixed
across explanation methods, more robust methods (e.g., LIME, SHAP) tend to be less faithfulsix explanation methods on five non-robust models · CIFAR10faithfulness vs local LipschitzHurt

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy