atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Clustering

Deep Divergence Learning

ICML 2020 · Learning theory and algorithms › Clustering · approach: Clustering approximation algorithms · 5 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Replace Euclidean distance with a learned Deep Bregman divergence under triplet lossDeep metric learning · Cifar10k-nn classification accuracy: 77.00 -> 81.40Helped
Replace Euclidean distance with a learned Deep Bregman divergence under triplet lossDeep metric learning · Fashion MNISTk-nn classification accuracy: 93.24 -> 94.90Helped
Replace Euclidean distance with a learned Deep Bregman divergence under triplet lossDeep metric learning · SVHNk-nn classification accuracy: 92.58 -> 94.03Helped
Replace Euclidean distance with a learned Deep Bregman divergence under triplet lossDeep metric learning · STL10k-nn classification accuracy: 59.97 -> 62.64Helped
Replace Euclidean distance with a learned Deep Bregman divergence under triplet lossDeep metric learning · MNISTk-nn classification accuracy: 99.50 -> 99.61Helped
Replace Euclidean distance with a learned Deep Bregman divergence under contrastive lossDeep metric learning · Fashion MNISTk-nn classification accuracy: 93.57 -> 94.00Helped
Replace Euclidean distance with a learned Deep Bregman divergence under contrastive lossDeep metric learning · Cifar10k-nn classification accuracy: 79.40 -> 80.80Helped
Replace Euclidean distance with a learned Deep Bregman divergence under contrastive lossDeep metric learning · SVHNk-nn classification accuracy: 94.88 -> 94.12Hurt
Replace Euclidean distance with a learned Deep Bregman divergence under contrastive lossDeep metric learning · STL10k-nn classification accuracy: 63.10 -> 60.91Hurt
Use distributional moment matching rather than treating generated points independentlySemi-supervised distributional clustering · Synthetic Gaussian clustering test setRI mean: 0.639 -> 0.999Helped
Use distributional moment matching rather than treating generated points independentlySemi-supervised distributional clustering · Synthetic Gaussian clustering test setARI mean: 0.198 -> 0.997Helped
Use distributional moment matching rather than treating generated points independentlySemi-supervised distributional clustering · WHARFARI mean: 0.098 -> 0.364Helped

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy