atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Fairness

Meritocratic Fairness for Cross-Population Selection

ICML 2017 · Learning theory and algorithms › Fairness · approach: Fair allocation and selection · 37 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use FAIRTOP (noisy top-k on normalized empirical CCDF scores) instead of deterministic greedy top-k by empirical CDFcross-population selection · Simulation (m1=100, m2=50)unfairness ratio / fairnessHelped
Increase epsilon in FAIRTOP to reduce regret at the cost of weaker fairness (ablation)FAIRTOP · Simulation regret vs population sizeregretHelped
Impose exact ex-interim fairness constraint (instead of approximate)selection algorithms · Theoretical lower bound (Theorem 5.1)regretHurt
Grow population sizes in fixed ratio (regret of FAIRTOP)FAIRTOP · Simulation / Corollary 3.8regretHelped
Use a learned parametric model (normal CDF from estimated means) instead of FAIRTOPcross-population selection · Simulation with non-normal population 2 scoresfairnessHurt

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy