atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Prediction and decision losses

Joint Dimensionality Reduction and Metric Learning: A Geometric Take

ICML 2017 · Learning theory and algorithms › Prediction and decision losses · approach: Metric and ordinal embedding · 47 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Learn the projection W jointly with the metric M (vs. PCA preprocessing then metric learning)DRML · ASLANAUC: 0.630 vs 0.602 for best PCA baseline at p=25Helped
Fix W to the PCA subspace and learn only the metric (no joint learning) (ablation)DRML · ASLAN HoGCRR: roughly 1% drop, 57.4% CRRHurt
Use quotient geometry on W M W^T (full DRML) vs LL^T factorization with Euclidean geometry (ablation)Metric factorization · ASLANAUC: 0.617 vs 0.601 at p=1000Helped
Kernelize the joint formulation (kDRML) with RBF kernel on ASLANDRML · ASLAN HoFAUC: 0.64 vs 0.60 (DRML HoF 0.64 vs kDRML 0.64)Helped
Kernelize formulation (kDRML) with Chi-square kernel on iLIDSDRML · iLIDSCMC rank-1: 39.2% vs 32.0%Helped
Replace PCA preprocessing with joint learning across ASLAN features (DRML AUC vs PCA-based baselines)Metric learning on ASLAN · ASLAN HnFAUC: DRML 0.63 vs LDML 0.61Helped
Use projection kernel on Grassmann-manifold subspaces (kDRML) instead of PCA-based baselineskDRML · YTFAccuracy: 71.9% vs 67.5% for KISSME (closest)Helped

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy