atlas

Research map / Time series / Foundation models for time series

Explaining Time Series via Contrastive and Locally Sparse Perturbations

ICLR 2024 · Time series › Foundation models for time series · approach: Time series representation learning · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes ContraLSP, a perturbation-based time series explainer that learns counterfactual perturbations via a triplet contrastive loss and sample-specific locally sparse gates with a learned temporal trend smoothing term.

Problem

Explaining multivariate time series models by identifying salient time-feature locations; existing perturbation methods produce out-of-distribution or informative perturbations, causing unfaithful explanations, especially with heterogeneous samples.

Approach

Learn a perturbation function whose outputs are counterfactual via inverse triplet contrastive loss (pulled toward negative-class samples, pushed from anchor's positives) to keep perturbations in-domain and uninformative, combined with sample-specific l0-relaxed stochastic sparse gates whose logits are modulated by a learned trend function for smooth binary-skewed masks.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
add contrastive triplet loss (ablation)ContraLSP · Switch-FeatureAUP: 0.97_{\pm0.01} -> 0.98_{\pm0.00}Helped
add contrastive triplet loss (ablation)ContraLSP · StateAUP: 0.88_{\pm0.03} -> 0.90_{\pm0.03}Helped
add trend function (ablation)ContraLSP · Switch-FeatureAUP: +0.06Helped
add trend function (ablation)ContraLSP · StateAUP: +0.13Helped
use Euclidean distance instead of Manhattan distance in contrastive loss (ablation)ContraLSP · Rare-TimeI_m: 19.51_{\pm0.30} -> 19.67_{\pm0.52}No clear effect
use cosine similarity instead of Manhattan distance in contrastive loss (ablation)ContraLSP · Rare-TimeI_m: 19.51_{\pm0.30} -> 18.41_{\pm0.64}Hurt
increase regularization factors to alpha=1.0 and beta=2.0 (ablation)ContraLSP · Switch-FeatureAUP: 0.53_{\pm0.05} -> 0.98_{\pm0.01}Helped
use alpha=2.0 and beta=1.0 (ablation)ContraLSP · StateAUP: 0.54_{\pm0.01} -> 0.90_{\pm0.02}Helped
use alpha=0.005 and beta=0.01 (ablation)ContraLSP · MIMIC-III mortality, average substitutionCE: 0.124_{\pm0.007} -> 0.127_{\pm0.007}Mixed

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Rare-Time (synthetic) Rare-Observation (synthetic) Switch-Feature (synthetic) State (synthetic) MIMIC-III

Benchmarks: Rare-Time Rare-Observation Switch-Feature State MIMIC-III mortality

Metrics: AUP AUR information I_m mask entropy S_m Accuracy Cross-Entropy Sufficiency Comprehensiveness

Baselines: Feature Occlusion Augmented Feature Occlusion Integrated Gradients Shapley Value Sampling Dynamask Extrmask GradSHAP DeepLIFT LIME FIT RETAIN

Builds on: Extrmask Dynamask stochastic gates (STG) triplet loss preservation game

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy