atlas

Research map / Image generation / Fast diffusion sampling

Efficient Integrators for Diffusion Generative Models

ICLR 2024 · Image generation › Fast diffusion sampling · approach: Training-free diffusion acceleration · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes Conjugate Integrators and Splitting Integrators (plus their combination) as fast deterministic and stochastic samplers for augmented diffusion models, applied to Phase Space Langevin Diffusion (PSLD) on CIFAR-10.

Problem

Slow sample generation in diffusion models, especially augmented (position-momentum) diffusions like PSLD, which lack efficient samplers at low NFE budgets.

Approach

Conjugate integrators map the probability-flow ODE into an affine-transformed space with a tunable matrix B_t (lambda-DDIM), generalizing DDIM and exponential integrators; splitting integrators borrowed from molecular dynamics alternate position and momentum updates, with reduced-NFE adjustments, and are combined with conjugate integrators.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
add score network preconditioning (ablation)CSPS-D on PSLD · CIFAR-10, NFE=50FID: 3.21 -> 2.65Helped
add score network preconditioning (ablation)SPS-S on PSLD · CIFAR-10FID: 2.76 -> 2.74; 2.36 -> 2.47Mixed
use reduced splitting adjustments instead of naive splitting (ablation)deterministic PSLD samplers · CIFAR-10FID: 132.45 -> 23.5; 23.47 -> 5.31; 69.06 -> 14.19; 14.49 -> 3.41Helped
reuse score evaluations and tune position-space noise in OBA (ablation)stochastic PSLD sampler · CIFAR-10FID: 36.87 -> 2.76; 15.18 -> 2.36Helped
add lambda-DDIM-II conjugacy to reduced deterministic splitting (ablation)RVV and RSE on PSLD · CIFAR-10FID: 14.19 -> 3.21; 3.41 -> 2.11; 23.5 -> 3.92; 5.31 -> 2.68Helped
add lambda-DDIM-II conjugacy to reduced stochastic splitting (ablation)ROBA on PSLD · CIFAR-10FID: 2.76 -> 2.94; 2.36 -> 2.49Hurt
use conjugate splitting rather than Euler-based reduced splitting (ablation)deterministic PSLD sampling · CIFAR-10FID: FID scores of 2.65 and 2.11 in 50 and 100 NFEsHelped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: CIFAR-10 CelebA-64 AFHQ-v2

Benchmarks: CIFAR-10 CelebA-64 AFHQ-v2

Metrics: FID NFE

Baselines: DDIM DEIS DPM-Solver-3 PNDM EDM gDDIM A-DDIM SA-Solver SEEDS-2 SSCS Euler-Maruyama

Builds on: DDIM Phase Space Langevin Diffusion DEIS EDM

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy