atlas

Research map / Image generation / Editing and style transfer

Motion Guidance: Diffusion-Based Image Editing with Differentiable Motion Estimators

ICLR 2024 · Image generation › Editing and style transfer · approach: Inversion-based diffusion editing · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes motion guidance, a zero-shot method that steers Stable Diffusion sampling with gradients through an off-the-shelf RAFT optical flow network plus a color-consistency loss so that edited images follow a user-specified dense flow field.

Problem

Precisely editing object layout, position, pose, and shape in images with diffusion models is difficult; existing motion-editing methods are limited to sparse motion inputs, require text, per-image finetuning, or specific architectures.

Approach

Use an off-the-shelf differentiable optical flow estimator as classifier-style guidance on one-step clean-image predictions, combined with a warp-based color loss, occlusion masking, edit masks, recursive denoising and gradient clipping, so dense flow fields can be imposed without training.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
remove recursive denoising (ablation)Motion Guidance · Qualitative image editsedit qualityHurt
remove the color loss (ablation)Motion Guidance · Qualitative image editsappearance fidelityHurt
remove the flow loss and replace computed flow with target flow in the color loss (ablation)Motion Guidance · Qualitative image editsdisocclusion qualityHurt
remove occlusion masking (ablation)Motion Guidance · Qualitative image editsocclusion qualityHurt
turn guidance off for the final 100 stepsMotion Guidance · Qualitative image editsimage detail qualityHelped
use fewer recursive denoising stepsMotion Guidance · Motion transferedit qualityHelped
use RePaint instead of Motion GuidanceMotion Guidance · Curated dataset and KITTIFlow LossMixed
use RePaint instead of Motion GuidanceMotion Guidance · Curated dataset and KITTICLIP SimilarityHurt
use SDEdit with forward warping instead of Motion GuidanceMotion Guidance · Curated dataset and KITTICLIP SimilarityHurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: KITTI Unsplash images (curated) Stable Diffusion generated images (curated)

Benchmarks: curated motion-editing dataset KITTI-derived dataset

Metrics: Flow Loss (RAFT) Flow Loss (GMFlow) CLIP Similarity

Baselines: InstructPix2Pix SDEdit forward warp RePaint forward warp DragGAN GMFlow (flow metric)

Builds on: classifier guidance reconstruction guidance DDIM RePaint SDEdit

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy