atlas

Research map / Video / Video segmentation and tracking

Don't Judge by the Look: Towards Motion Coherent Video Representation

ICLR 2024 · Video › Video segmentation and tracking · approach: Layered video decomposition and dynamics · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Shows that hue variance helps video recognition and proposes Motion Coherent Augmentation (MCA), combining the efficient RGB-channel-swap-based SwapMix with Variation Alignment loss, to improve motion-focused video models.

Problem

Video recognition models overfit on small datasets, and hue jittering, a common augmentation, is avoided in object recognition because it changes appearance and is slow to compute in HSV space; its effect on video understanding is unstudied.

Approach

Hue variance is beneficial for video because motion matters more than static appearance. SwapMix cheaply alters hue by randomly permuting RGB channels and linearly mixing with the original video, and Variation Alignment aligns predictions on original and appearance-varied pairs (KL-style loss) so the model learns appearance-invariant representations.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Add MCATSM · UCF101Acc1. (%): 79.57 -> 81.87; +2.30Helped
Add MCATSM · HMDB51Acc1. (%): 48.63 -> 51.63; +3.00Helped
Add MCATSM · Something-Something V2Acc1. (%): 59.29 -> 60.71; +1.42Helped
Add MCATSM · Kinetics400Acc1. (%): 70.28 -> 71.08; +0.80Helped
Add MCAMoCo with I3D encoder · UCF101Acc1. (%): 63.68 -> 67.99; +4.31Helped
Pretrain with MCA rather than the listed augmentation baselineTSM · HMDB51 linear probingAcc1. (%): 63.59 -> 65.95Helped
Set lambda_AV to 1.00 (ablation)TSM+MCA · Something-Something V1Acc1. (%): 45.63 -> 47.57Helped
Increase lambda_AV from 1.00 to 2.00 or 3.00 (ablation)TSM+MCA · Something-Something V1Acc1. (%): 47.57 -> 47.03; 47.57 -> 46.57Hurt
Combine Background Erasing with MCATSM · Something-Something V1Acc1. (%): 47.57 -> 48.05Helped
Add MCATSM · ActivityNetmAP (%): 73.10 -> 74.75; +1.65Helped
Reduce MCA application probability to rho 0.25 (ablation)TSM+MCA · Something-Something V1Acc1. (%): 45.63 -> 47.26Helped
Use Hue Jittering instead of SwapMix (ablation)TSM · Something-Something V1Acc1. (%)Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Something-Something V1 Something-Something V2 UCF101 HMDB51 Kinetics400 ActivityNet v1.3 CIFAR10

Benchmarks: Something-Something V1 Something-Something V2 UCF101 HMDB51 Kinetics400 ActivityNet

Metrics: Top-1 accuracy ECE mAP training time

Baselines: TSM Hue Jittering Cutout CutMix Mixup VideoMix Background Erasing AugMix RandAugment Uniformer-S SlowFast

Builds on: TSM Uniformer CS-KD AugMix RandAugment

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy