atlas

Research map / 3D vision / 3D generation

Deep SE(3)-Equivariant Geometric Reasoning for Precise Placement Tasks

ICLR 2024 · 3D vision › 3D generation · approach: 2D-to-3D pretrained representations · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes RelDist, an SE(3)-invariant pairwise distance representation over two objects, decoded into a provably SE(3)-equivariant cross-pose via differentiable multilateration and Procrustes (SVD) layers, trained end-to-end from few demonstrations.

Problem

Predicting precise relative placement poses (e.g., hanging a mug on a rack) from high-dimensional point cloud demonstrations, where the prediction must be SE(3)-equivariant to object poses and invariant to camera pose, and learning from few demonstrations is hard without inductive biases.

Approach

Predict an SE(3)-invariant pairwise distance matrix (RelDist) between points of object A and object B, recover each A-point's goal location by closed-form differentiable multilateration, then fit the rigid transform with differentiable weighted Procrustes (SVD); the composition is provably equivariant to transforms of either object.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use the proposed method instead of TAX-PoseRLBench relative placement tasks · RLBench placement tasksrotation error (°): 1.485 -> 0.764; 1.173 -> 1.150; 5.471 -> 0.624; 4.144 -> 0.804; 7.098 -> 1.209Helped
Use the proposed method instead of TAX-PoseRLBench relative placement tasks · RLBench placement taskstranslation error (m): 0.003 -> 0.001; 0.001 -> 0.001; 0.012 -> 0.002; 0.005 -> 0.001; 0.004 -> 0.003Mixed
Use the proposed method instead of TAX-PoseMug Hanging · Mug Hanging (Upright/Arbitrary), Place <1cmPlace success rate: 0.15/0.32 -> 0.35/0.36Helped
Use the proposed method instead of TAX-PoseMug Hanging · Mug Hanging (Upright/Arbitrary), Overall <1cmOverall success rate: 0.15/0.14 -> 0.35/0.19Helped
Use the proposed method instead of TAX-PoseMug Hanging · Mug Hanging (Upright/Arbitrary), Place ∞Place success rate: 0.93/0.85 -> 0.99/0.88Helped
remove SE(3) data augmentation (ablation)Ours · Arbitrary Mug Hanging, Place <1cmPlace success rate: 0.35 -> 0.24Helped
remove SE(3) data augmentation (ablation)Ours · Arbitrary Mug Hanging, Place <3cmPlace success rate: 0.70 -> 0.77Helped
remove SE(3) data augmentation (ablation)Ours · Arbitrary Mug Hanging, Place ∞Place success rate: 0.85 -> 0.87Helped
remove SE(3) data augmentation (ablation)Ours · Arbitrary Mug Hanging, Overall <1cmOverall success rate: 0.14 -> 0.05Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: RLBench placement tasks (10 demos each) NDF mug hanging training data real-world mug-hanging demonstrations (from TAX-Pose authors)

Benchmarks: RLBench placement tasks (stack_wine, toilet_roll, hang_hanger, phone_on_base, insert_peg) NDF mug hanging NDF bottle placement NDF bowl placement real-world mug hanging offline dataset

Metrics: rotation error (degrees) translation error (m) grasp/place/overall success rate under penetration threshold

Baselines: TAX-Pose Neural Descriptor Fields Dense Object Nets

Builds on: TAX-Pose Vector Neurons DGCNN Neural Descriptor Fields Dense Object Nets

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy