Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Prediction and decision losses
Contract-based Inter-user Usage Coordination in Free-floating Car Sharing
Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers
AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.
Measured effects reported in the paper
| What was changed | Where | Measured | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| use contract-based auctions with relocation values instead of the baseline regulation | free-floating car sharing · 0 Hubs, 50 vehicles | social surplus: 7,398 -> 12,011 | Helped |
| use contract-based auctions with relocation values instead of the baseline regulation | free-floating car sharing · 0 Hubs, 200 vehicles | social surplus: 19,635 -> 20,023 | Helped |
| use contract-based auctions with relocation values instead of the baseline regulation | free-floating car sharing · 5 Hubs, 50 vehicles | social surplus: 3,977 -> 9,496 | Helped |
| use contract-based auctions with relocation values instead of the baseline regulation | free-floating car sharing · 5 Hubs, 200 vehicles | social surplus: 15,207 -> 18,900 | Helped |
| use contract-based auctions with relocation values instead of the baseline regulation | free-floating car sharing · 1 Hub, 50 vehicles | social surplus: 4,098 -> 6,998 | Helped |
| use contract-based auctions with relocation values instead of the baseline regulation | free-floating car sharing · 1 Hub, 200 vehicles | social surplus: 15,469 -> 18,678 | Helped |
| use contract-based auctions instead of baseline regulation | free-floating car sharing · 0 Hubs, 200 vehicles | service level: 0.745 -> 0.613 | Hurt |
| use contract-based auctions instead of baseline regulation | free-floating car sharing · 5 Hubs, 50 vehicles | service level: 0.154 -> 0.254 | Helped |
| add relocation values to the auction (ablation) | contract-based car-sharing auction · 0 Hubs, 200 vehicles | social surplus: 22,649 -> 20,023 | Hurt |
| add relocation values to the auction (ablation) | contract-based car-sharing auction · 5 Hubs, 50 vehicles | social surplus: 8,193 -> 9,496 | Helped |
| add relocation values to the auction (ablation) | contract-based car-sharing auction · 5 Hubs, 200 vehicles | social surplus: 20,478 -> 18,900 | Hurt |
| add relocation values to the auction (ablation) | contract-based car-sharing auction · 1 Hub, 50 vehicles | social surplus: 6,113 -> 6,998 | Helped |
Closest papers by meaning
- Allocation Problems in Ride-Sharing Platforms: Online Matching With Offline Reusable Resources (AAAI 2018 · similarity 0.85)
- Balancing the Tradeoff between Profit and Fairness in Rideshare Platforms during High-Demand Hours (AAAI 2020 · similarity 0.84)
- Optimizing Ride-Pooling Operations with Extended Pickup and Drop-Off Flexibility (AAAI 2026 · similarity 0.84)
- Algorithms for Trip-Vehicle Assignment in Ride-Sharing (AAAI 2018 · similarity 0.84)
- Future Aware Pricing and Matching for Sustainable On-Demand Ride Pooling (AAAI 2023 · similarity 0.83)
- Balancing Efficiency and Fairness in On-Demand Ridesourcing (NeurIPS 2019 · similarity 0.83)
Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.