AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Bandits and online learning / Contextual bandits and Thompson sampling

Neural Thompson Sampling

ICLR 2021 · Bandits and online learning › Contextual bandits and Thompson sampling · approach: Thompson sampling analysis · 31 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use NeuralTS instead of NeuralUCBcontextual bandit classification · Adulttotal regret: 2092.5 ±48.0 vs 2061.8 ±42.8Hurt
Use NeuralTS instead of NeuralUCBcontextual bandit classification · Covertypetotal regret: 3012.1 ±87.0 -> 2999.1 ±74.3Helped
Use NeuralTS instead of NeuralUCBcontextual bandit classification · Magic Telescopetotal regret: 2033.0 ±48.6 -> 2037.4 ±61.3Hurt
Use NeuralTS instead of BootstrapNNcontextual bandit classification · MNISTtotal regret: 1765.6 ±321.1 -> 1583.4 ±198.5Helped
Use NeuralTS instead of BootstrapNNcontextual bandit classification · Mushroomtotal regret: 132.3 ±8.6 -> 115.0 ±35.8Helped
Use NeuralTS instead of Kernel UCBcontextual bandit classification · Shuttletotal regret: 166.5 ±39.4 -> 232.0 ±149.5Hurt
Use NeuralTS rather than NeuralUCB as reward delays increasecontextual bandits with delayed rewards · UCI datasets and MNISTtotal regretHelped

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy