atlas

Research map / Adversarial robustness and security / Certified and empirical robustness

Characterizing Adversarial Subspaces Using Local Intrinsic Dimensionality

ICLR 2018 · Adversarial robustness and security › Certified and empirical robustness · approach: Attack evaluation and defense critique · 486 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use LID features instead of KD+BU featuresAdversarial-example detector · MNIST OptAUC (%): 95.35 -> 99.24Helped
Use LID features instead of KD+BU featuresAdversarial-example detector · CIFAR-10 OptAUC (%): 93.77 -> 98.94Helped
Use LID features instead of KD+BU featuresAdversarial-example detector · SVHN OptAUC (%): 90.66 -> 97.60Helped
Train the LID detector on FGM examples and test on other attack strategiesLID detector · CIFAR-10 BIM-a, BIM-b, JSMA, and OptAUC (%): 82.30; 91.61; 89.93; 93.32Helped
Increase LID-estimation minibatch size from 100 to 1000LID-based detector · Opt attacks on MNIST, CIFAR-10, and SVHNAUCHelped
Add a LID term to the adaptive Opt attack objectiveLID-based detector · MNIST adaptive Opt, Scenario 1Attack failure rate (%): 100No clear effect
Add a LID term to the adaptive Opt attack objectiveLID-based detector · CIFAR-10 adaptive Opt, Scenario 2Attack failure rate (%): 95.7No clear effect

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy