atlas

Research map / Video / Video-language understanding

Scalable Video-to-Dataset Generation for Cross-Platform Mobile Agents

CVPR 2025 · Video › Video-language understanding · approach: Video LLMs with fine-grained understanding · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces MONDAY, a 313K-frame cross-platform mobile OS navigation dataset auto-extracted from 20K YouTube instructional videos using OCR scene detection and GPT-4o-based multi-step action identification.

Problem

Mobile OS GUI agents lack diverse, real-world, cross-platform training data; manual annotation is costly and static datasets become obsolete as OS versions change.

Approach

Automatically mine navigation procedures from instructional YouTube videos: OCR-based text-change scene transition detection, GroundingDINO+PaddleOCR UI element detection with Set-of-Marks, and a 3-step GPT-4o action identification (scene summary, initial action, zoomed refinement) guided by narrations.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Pretrain SeeClick on MONDAYSeeClick, then finetune on AitW · Windows Mobileaccuracy: 35.61 -> 47.56Helped
Pretrain SeeClick on MONDAYSeeClick, then finetune on AMEX · AMEXaccuracy: 68.19 -> 80.00Helped
Pretrain SeeClick on MONDAYSeeClick, then finetune on AitW · MONDAYaccuracy: 37.45 -> 60.71Helped
Use OCR-based text change detection instead of visual-feature transition detectionScene transition detection · Scene transition detection evaluation datasetF1-score: 82.27 -> 95.04Helped
Use mobile-specific filtering with GroundingDINO and OCRUI element detection · UI element detection evaluation datasetHit Ratio: 91.83 -> 99.87Helped
Add the final refinement step (ablation)Multi-image 3-step action identification · Action identification evaluation datasetaccuracy (Touch): 89.97 -> 91.84Helped
Use multi-stage reasoning instead of direct one-step action identification (ablation)Action identification · Action identification evaluation datasetaccuracy (Touch): 74.67 -> 91.84Helped
Add narration (ablation)Multi-image 3-step action identification · Action identification evaluation datasetaccuracy (All): 78.20 -> 80.90Helped
Use temporal context from multiple images rather than a single image (ablation)Action identification · Action identification evaluation datasetaccuracy (All): 77.22 -> 80.90Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: MONDAY AitW AMEX C4 Dolma RICO

Benchmarks: AitW AMEX MONDAY Windows Mobile (unseen platform)

Metrics: scene transition F1-score hit ratio action matching accuracy touch action accuracy

Baselines: SceneDetect YUV-diff OmniParser Video2Action SeeClick Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct

Builds on: Set-of-Marks Android in the Wild SeeClick GroundingDINO Video2Action

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy