atlas

Research map / 3D vision / 3D generation

Reconstructing Animals and the Wild

CVPR 2025 · 3D vision › 3D generation · approach: Open-vocabulary 3D scene understanding · 2 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Trains an LLM (Vicuna-7B with frozen CLIP encoder) to decode a CLIP embedding of a natural image into a compositional graphics-code scene of animals and environment, using a 1M-image synthetic Infinigen-based dataset with a CLIP-projection head for asset appearance.

Problem

Reconstructing 3D natural scenes containing animals and their environment (trees, bushes, boulders) from a single monocular image, where prior work only reconstructs isolated animals and asset names as discrete tokens generalize poorly out of distribution.

Approach

Replace discrete asset-name tokens with a special [CLIP] token whose hidden state is projected into a continuous CLIP embedding supervised by cosine similarity, enabling semantically meaningful asset estimation; combined with a [ROT] rotation head, scene-level attributes, value fuzzing and pixel-count conditioning.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Replace discrete asset names with CLIP appearance embeddings (ablation)RAW · ID and RAW-RWLPIPS: 0.720 -> 0.654; 0.772 -> 0.762Helped
Add ±0.5% uniform noise to scene-level training attributes (ablation)RAW with CLIP appearance embeddings · IDLPIPS: 0.654 -> 0.612Helped
Add ±0.5% uniform noise to scene-level training attributes (ablation)RAW with CLIP appearance embeddings · RAW-RWLPIPS: 0.762 -> 0.762No clear effect
Add visible pixel count for each object to the sequence (ablation)RAW with CLIP appearance embeddings and value fuzzing · IDLPIPS: 0.612 -> 0.598Helped
Add visible pixel count for each object to the sequence (ablation)RAW with CLIP appearance embeddings and value fuzzing · RAW-RWLPIPS: 0.762 -> 0.724Helped
Use BioCLIP rather than CLIP for appearance embeddings (ablation)RAW · ID and RAW-RWLPIPS: 0.598 -> 0.676; 0.724 -> 0.730Hurt
Use DINOv2 rather than CLIP for appearance embeddings (ablation)RAW · ID and RAW-RWLPIPS: 0.598 -> 0.597; 0.724 -> 0.743Mixed
Use DINOv2 rather than CLIP for appearance embeddings (ablation)RAW · ID and RAW-RWDINOv2 cosine similarity: 0.858 -> 0.865; 0.631 -> 0.611Mixed

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: CC3M RAW synthetic dataset

Benchmarks: RAW synthetic in-distribution test set RAW-RW

Metrics: LPIPS CLIP cosine similarity BioCLIP cosine similarity DINOv2 cosine similarity

Baselines: IG-LLM YOLOX-6D-Pose

Builds on: IG-LLM Infinigen LLaMA CLIP

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy