atlas

Research map / Image generation / Image restoration

Reconciling Stochastic and Deterministic Strategies for Zero-shot Image Restoration using Diffusion Model in Dual

CVPR 2025 · Image generation › Image restoration · approach: Diffusion-based universal restoration · 6 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes RDMD, a zero-shot image restoration framework that uses one pre-trained diffusion model to build both a deterministic (RED-style) regularizer and a stochastic (DiffPIR-style) sampling regularizer, balanced by a single hyperparameter τ.

Problem

Zero-shot image restoration with plug-and-play and diffusion priors faces a trade-off: deterministic denoiser-based regression gives high fidelity but artifacts, while stochastic diffusion sampling gives perceptual quality but loses fidelity; prior combinations need extra networks.

Approach

Use a single pre-trained diffusion model's noise predictor in two roles within an HQS-style iteration: a stochastic reverse-diffusion step for the x sub-problem and a deterministic RED-style gradient step for the z sub-problem, with τ controlling the distortion-perception tradeoff.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Reconcile deterministic regression with stochastic samplingRDMD · FFHQ 256×256, Gaussian deblurPSNR: 27.84 -> 28.29Helped
Reconcile deterministic regression with stochastic samplingRDMD · FFHQ 256×256, super-resolution (8×)PSNR: 22.22 -> 23.31Helped
Reconcile deterministic regression with stochastic samplingRDMD · ImageNet 256×256, super-resolution (8×)PSNR: 20.42 -> 20.83Helped
Reconcile deterministic regression with stochastic samplingRDMD · ImageNet 256×256, motion deblurPSNR: 23.34 -> 22.77Hurt
Reconcile deterministic regression with stochastic samplingRDMD · FFHQ 256×256, super-resolution (8×)LPIPS: 0.4883 -> 0.3614Helped
Use stochastic sampling instead of deterministic regression (ablation)RDMD · FFHQ 256×256, super-resolution (8×)PSNR: 22.22 -> 21.08Hurt
Use stochastic sampling instead of deterministic regression (ablation)RDMD · FFHQ 256×256, super-resolution (8×)LPIPS: 0.4883 -> 0.3666Helped
Increase iteration count to T = 100 (ablation)RDMD · FFHQ 256×256, super-resolution (4×)PSNRHelped
Increase iteration count beyond T = 100 (ablation)RDMD · FFHQ 256×256, super-resolution (4×)PSNRHurt
Increase iteration count (ablation)RDMD · FFHQ 256×256, super-resolution (4×)LPIPSHelped
Set λ too low (λ = 10) (ablation)RDMD · FFHQ 256×256, super-resolution (4×)PSNRHurt
Increase λ from 20 to 50 (ablation)RDMD · FFHQ 256×256, super-resolution (4×)PSNRHurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: FFHQ 256x256 ImageNet 256x256

Benchmarks: FFHQ 256x256 ImageNet 256x256

Metrics: PSNR SSIM LPIPS

Baselines: MCG DPS Resample BIRD RED DiffPIR

Builds on: plug-and-play regularization by denoising DDIM DiffPIR DPS

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy