atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Recognition and long-tail

Plug-and-Play PPO: An Adaptive Point Prompt Optimizer Making SAM Greater

CVPR 2025 · Label-efficient and robust learning › Recognition and long-tail · approach: Dense features and foundation priors · 5 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes PPO, a plug-and-play DRL-based optimizer that refines SAM point prompts on a dual-space (DINOv2 feature and physical distance) heterogeneous graph without per-task training.

Problem

SAM's class-agnostic segmentation depends heavily on point prompt quality, and automatically generated point prompts often have redundant or erroneous points with poor distribution.

Approach

Builds a dual-space heterogeneous graph of prompt candidates using DINOv2 patch feature distances and physical distances, and trains a Q-learning DRL agent (add/delete/move node actions) with a distance-based reward to select an optimized, sparse set of positive/negative prompts that are fed to SAM; the agent is trained once on GBMSD and transferred without retraining.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Optimize FM point prompts with PPOSAM · ISICmDSC (%): 48.5 -> 75.4Helped
Optimize FM point prompts with PPOSAM · KvasirmDSC (%): 27.2 -> 70.3Helped
Optimize FM point prompts with PPOSAM · VOC2012mDSC (%): 34.7 -> 73.7Helped
Optimize FM point prompts with PPO (ablation)SAM · FSS-1000mDSC (%): 72.1 -> 91.9Helped
Optimize feature space only (α=1, β=0) (ablation)SAM prompt optimization · FSS-1000mDSC (%): 72.1 -> 81.3Helped
Optimize physical space only (α=0, β=1) (ablation)SAM prompt optimization · FSS-1000mDSC (%): 72.1 -> 73.5Helped
Optimize both feature and physical spaces (α=1, β=1) (ablation)SAM prompt optimization · FSS-1000mDSC (%): 72.1 -> 86.6Helped
Increase physical-space weight to β=5 (α=1) (ablation)PPO prompt optimization · FSS-1000mDSC (%): 86.6 -> 82.4Hurt
Increase feature-space weight to α=5 (β=1) (ablation)PPO prompt optimization · FSS-1000mDSC (%): 86.6 -> 91.9Helped
Optimize CS prompts with PPOSAM · ISICmDSC (%): 57.7 -> 68.6Helped
Optimize CS prompts with PPOSAM · KvasirmDSC (%): 69.1 -> 79.8Helped
Optimize Matcher prompts with PPOSAM · KvasirmDSC (%): 46.2 -> 77.6Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: GBMSD FSS-1000 VOC2012 ISIC2018 Kvasir

Benchmarks: FSS-1000 VOC2012 ISIC2018 Kvasir

Metrics: mDSC mHD

Baselines: HSNet VAT SegGPT PerSAM Matcher CS

Builds on: Segment Anything Model DINOv2 Matcher Deep Q-network

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy