atlas

Research map / Detection and segmentation / Weakly supervised detection and segmentation

Multi-Label Prototype Visual Spatial Search for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentation

CVPR 2025 · Detection and segmentation › Weakly supervised detection and segmentation · approach: CAM refinement and prototypes · 6 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes MuP-VSS, a ViT-based weakly supervised semantic segmentation method that learns multi-label prototypes via global embedding and a Prototype Embedding Module, optimized by cross-class, cross-image, and patch-to-prototype losses to reduce classification bias in image-level WSSS.

Problem

Image-level weakly supervised semantic segmentation produces incomplete pseudo masks from CAM and transformer self-attention maps because the multi-label classification loss focuses on discriminative regions (classification bias).

Approach

Replaces classification-driven localization with query-based visual spatial search: learned multi-label prototypes (from a convolutional global embedding) are matched against patch tokens, and they are optimized with contrastive losses exploiting exclusivity (cross-class) and consistency (cross-image) plus a patch-to-prototype consistency loss, instead of the multi-label classification loss on pro

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use MuP-VSS instead of CTIDeiT-S WSSS seed generation · PASCAL VOC 2012 train (Seed)mIoU (%): 69.5 -> 71.7Helped
use MuP-VSS instead of CTIDeiT-S WSSS pseudo-mask generation · PASCAL VOC 2012 train (Mask)mIoU (%): 73.7 -> 74.1Helped
use MuP-VSS instead of DuPLsemantic segmentation · PASCAL VOC 2012 valmIoU (%): 72.2 -> 73.6Helped
use MuP-VSS instead of AEFTsemantic segmentation · PASCAL VOC 2012 testmIoU (%): 71.7 -> 74.7Helped
use MuP-VSS instead of DiGsemantic segmentation · MS COCO valmIoU (%): 45.5% vs 46.6%Helped
remove multi-label prototype optimization (MPO) (ablation)MuP-VSS · PASCAL VOC 2012 train (Seed)mIoU (%): 71.7 -> 64.2Hurt
remove multi-label prototype representation (MPR) (ablation)MuP-VSS · PASCAL VOC 2012 train (Seed)mIoU (%): 71.7 -> 63.1Hurt
add Global Embedding (ablation)Base-R prototype representation · PASCAL VOC 2012 train (Seed)mIoU (%): 63.1 -> 67.1Helped
add PEM (ablation)Base-R prototype representation · PASCAL VOC 2012 train (Seed)mIoU (%): 63.1 -> 66.6Helped
add CCP loss (ablation)Base-O prototype optimization · PASCAL VOC 2012 train (Seed)mIoU (%): 64.2 -> 67.5Helped
add CIP loss (ablation)Base-O prototype optimization · PASCAL VOC 2012 train (Seed)mIoU (%): 64.2 -> 66.7Helped
add P2P loss (ablation)Base-O prototype optimization · PASCAL VOC 2012 train (Seed)mIoU (%): 64.2 -> 68.4Helped

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: PASCAL VOC 2012 MS COCO 2014

Benchmarks: PASCAL VOC 2012 MS COCO 2014

Metrics: mIoU

Baselines: CDA ReCAM CLIMS ACR D2CAM SFC KTSE MCTformer CTI DiG DuPL DIAL

Builds on: Class Activation Map MCTformer ViT PSA DeepLab

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy