atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Zero-/few-shot and meta-learning

Logits DeConfusion with CLIP for Few-Shot Learning

CVPR 2025 · Label-efficient and robust learning › Zero-/few-shot and meta-learning · approach: Robust fine-tuning of zero-shot models · 18 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes Logits DeConfusion (LDC), which combines a multi-level adapter fusion module and a residual inter-class deconfusion module to learn and remove CLIP's inter-class logit confusion for few-shot classification.

Problem

CLIP's zero-shot logits show serious inter-class confusion in downstream tasks, which hurts accuracy in few-shot learning adaptation.

Approach

Model inter-class confusion as an additive noise term on CLIP logits, learned by adapters that take both zero-shot logits and visual features as priors, and subtract it through a residual structure; fuse with an MLP-based logits branch via adaptive weighting, with an L1 similarity loss to prevent over-deconfusion.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use LDC rather than FARCLIP on ImageNet, 16-shot · ImageNet, 16-shotaccuracy: 66.39 -> 66.63Helped
Use LDC rather than Proto-CLIP-FCLIP on the 11-dataset average, 16-shot · 11-dataset average, 16-shotaccuracy: 76.18 -> 79.78Helped
Apply LDC on ImageNet-SketchCLIP, ResNet-50, 16-shot · ImageNet-Sketchaccuracy: 36.69 -> 35.52Hurt
Add MAF to the ZS-CLIP baseline (ablation)CLIP, ResNet-50 · 11-dataset average, 16-shotaccuracy: 58.87 -> 70.83Helped
Add ICD to the ZS-CLIP baseline (ablation)CLIP, ResNet-50 · 11-dataset average, 16-shotaccuracy: 58.87 -> 77.94Helped
Add ALF to the MAF + ICD method (ablation)LDC, ResNet-50 · 11-dataset average, 16-shotaccuracy: 78.82 -> 79.78Helped
Add more feature levels to MAF (ablation)LDC, ResNet-50 · 11-dataset average, 16-shotaccuracy: 75.95 -> 77.48 -> 79.10 -> 79.78Helped
Use weighted fusion with weights 0.1/0.2/0.3/0.4 instead of equal weights (ablation)MAF · 11-dataset average, 16-shotaccuracy: 79.71 -> 79.78Helped
Add the projector to MAF (ablation)LDC, ResNet-50 · 11-dataset average, 16-shotaccuracy: 78.94 -> 79.78Helped
Add the residual structure to ICD (ablation)LDC, ResNet-50 · 11-dataset average, 16-shotaccuracy: 78.54 -> 79.78Helped
Use adaptive α instead of fixed α=0.5 for logits fusion (ablation)ALF · 11-dataset average, 16-shotaccuracy: 79.24 -> 79.78Helped
Add both similarity losses, LMAF Sim and LICD Sim (ablation)LDC training objective · 11-dataset average, 16-shotaccuracy: 79.03 -> 79.78Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: ImageNet Caltech101 DTD EuroSAT FGVCAircraft Flowers102 Food101 OxfordPets StanfordCars SUN397 UCF101

Benchmarks: ImageNet Caltech101 DTD EuroSAT FGVCAircraft Flowers102 Food101 OxfordPets StanfordCars SUN397 UCF101 ImageNet-V2

Metrics: accuracy

Baselines: CoOp VT-CLIP Tip-Adapter Tip-Adapter-F SuS-X FAR CALIP-FS SGVA-CLIP Proto-CLIP-F APE CLIP-Adapter DAC-V

Builds on: CLIP Tip-Adapter CoOp CLIP-Adapter

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy