atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Knowledge distillation

Scaled Decoupled Distillation

CVPR 2024 · Label-efficient and robust learning › Knowledge distillation · approach: Rethinking distillation objectives · 47 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes Scale Decoupled Distillation (SDD), which splits the global logit map into multi-scale local logits and distills consistent and complementary parts, improving logit-based KD on CIFAR-100, ImageNet, and CUB200.

Problem

Logit-based knowledge distillation underperforms feature-based methods because the global logit output mixes multiple semantic classes, transferring ambiguous knowledge to the student.

Approach

Apply multi-scale average pooling to the teacher and student logit maps before the classifier-output stage, distill each scale's local logits (with the standard KD or DKD/NKD loss), and up-weight the local logits whose predicted class differs from the global prediction (complementary terms) to emphasize ambiguous samples.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Add scale-decoupled distillation to DKDDKD · CIFAR-100accuracy: 68.98 -> 70.08Helped
Add scale-decoupled distillation to DKDDKD · ImageNet validation, ResNet-34 → ResNet18Top-1 accuracy (%): 71.70 -> 72.02Helped
Add scale-decoupled distillation to DKDDKD · CUB200accuracy: 59.94 -> 62.97Helped
Add consistent decoupled logits (ablation)Conventional KD, ResNet32x4 → ResNet8x4 · CIFAR-100accuracy: 73.33 -> 75.14Helped
Add complementary decoupled logits (ablation)Conventional KD, ResNet32x4 → ResNet8x4 · CIFAR-100accuracy: 73.33 -> 74.79Helped
Combine consistent and complementary decoupled logits (ablation)Conventional KD, ResNet32x4 → ResNet8x4 · CIFAR-100accuracy: 73.33 -> 76.63Helped
Use scales M={1,2} instead of global-only M={1} (ablation)SDD, ResNet32x4 → ResNet8x4 · CIFAR-100accuracy: 73.33 -> 76.63Helped
Use scales M={1,2,4} instead of M={1,2} (ablation)SDD, ResNet32x4 → ResNet8x4 · CIFAR-100accuracy: 76.63 -> 75.74Hurt
Use scales M={1,2,4} instead of global-only M={1} (ablation)SDD, ResNet32x4 → ShuffleNetV1 · CIFAR-100accuracy: 74.07 -> 76.30Helped
Increase complementary-loss weight to β=2 (ablation)SDD, ResNet32x4 → ShuffleNetV1 · CIFAR-100accuracy: 75.62 -> 76.30Helped
Increase complementary-loss weight from β=2 to β=4 (ablation)SDD, ResNet32x4 → ShuffleNetV1 · CIFAR-100accuracy: 76.30 -> 75.99Hurt
Use scale-decoupled pooling in KDKD, ResNet32x4 → ResNet8x4 · CIFAR-100training time (per batch): 11 -> 11No clear effect

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: CIFAR-100 ImageNet CUB200

Benchmarks: CIFAR-100 ImageNet CUB200

Metrics: top-1 accuracy top-5 accuracy

Baselines: KD FitNet SP CRD SemCKD ReviewKD MGD DKD NKD WCoRD PKT RKD

Builds on: Knowledge distillation (Hinton) DKD NKD CRD

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy