atlas

Research map / Vision-language and multimodal / Visual question answering

JTD-UAV: MLLM-Enhanced Joint Tracking and Description Framework for Anti-UAV Systems

CVPR 2025 · Vision-language and multimodal › Visual question answering · approach: Multimodal LLM question answering · 6 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces the UAV Tracking and Intent Understanding (UTIU) task and JTD-UAV, an MLLM-based framework that jointly tracks UAVs and describes their motion/intent via VQA, plus the TDUAV thermal benchmark.

Problem

Anti-UAV systems focus on position tracking and do not capture UAV motion states or intent; there is no joint tracking and intent-description benchmark or model.

Approach

A dual-branch framework pairing a UAV detection-and-tracking module (YOLOv8 global detector plus local tracker) with an MLLM that receives compressed visual features of the tracked UAV, trained jointly with a tracking loss and an LLM text loss to produce motion descriptions and answer VQA questions.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Add the JTD-UAV pipeline (tracking, feature compression, LLM with joint training) versus plain Qwen2-VL trained on same data (ablation)Qwen2-VL base model · TDUAV subsets 1-3BLEU-4, SPICE, ACC: BLEU-4 9.98 -> 12.75 (Subset 1); SPICE 0.2812 -> 0.3264; ACC 83.12 -> 92.52Helped
Joint training of tracking and description with the LLM, versus a description-only model (ablation)JTD-UAV · TDUAV subset 2BLEU-4: 10.12 -> 11.23Helped
Use JTD-UAV tracking (detector + tracker) for UAV tracking instead of prior anti-UAV trackersTracking on DUT Anti-UAV · DUT Anti-UAVACC: 0.612 vs best baseline KeepTrack 0.592Helped
Use JTD-UAV tracking instead of prior trackersTracking on Anti-UAV · Anti-UAVACC: 0.633 vs best baseline OSTrack 0.549Helped
Use JTD-UAV versus general MLLMs for description and VQACaption and VQA on TDUAV · TDUAV subsets 1-3BLEU-4: 12.75 vs GPT-4o 2.32 (Subset 1); 14.66 vs best open baseline Qwen2-VL-7B 10.36 (Subset 3)Helped

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: TDUAV AntiUAV LaSOT TrackingNet GOT10K COCO

Benchmarks: TDUAV DUT Anti-UAV Anti-UAV

Metrics: BLEU-1 BLEU-2 BLEU-3 BLEU-4 SPICE ACC tracking accuracy

Baselines: GPT-4o Qwen-Max Qwen-Turbo InternVL2-8B KOSMOS-2 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct OSTrack MixFormer Stark SwinTrack-Base Qwen2-VL (same data)

Builds on: YOLOv8 LLaVA Qwen2-VL

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy