atlas

Research map / Multi-agent systems and games / Human-AI and goal-conditioned

Open-World Drone Active Tracking with Goal-Centered Rewards

NeurIPS 2025 · Multi-agent systems and games › Human-AI and goal-conditioned · approach: Vision-language navigation agents · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces DAT, an open-world drone active air-to-ground tracking benchmark with 24 city-scale scenes and digital-twin scene generation, plus GC-VAT, a PPO-based RL tracker using a goal-centered reward and curriculum training.

Problem

Drone visual active tracking with reinforcement learning lacks a unified, realistic benchmark and struggles in open-world environments with interference, where distance-based rewards fail under tilted top-down camera views.

Approach

A goal-centered reward based on a projection-aware deviation metric (instead of Euclidean distance) that gives consistent feedback across unrestricted camera viewpoints, combined with a two-stage curriculum (simple straight-line targets, then complex occluded scenes) trained with PPO.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use the Goal-Centered Reward instead of the distance-based reward (ablation)GC-VAT · DAT farmland, cross-scene and cross-domainTSR: about 800% improvementHelped
remove Curriculum-Based Training (ablation)GC-VAT · DAT farmland, different teststracking performanceHurt
add domain randomization (ablation)GC-VAT · DAT farmlandtracking performanceHelped
randomize the drone's initial angle (ablation)GC-VAT domain randomization · DAT farmlandtracking performanceHelped
use GC-VAT instead of D-VATDAT · within-sceneCR: 35 -> 242Helped
use GC-VAT instead of D-VATDAT · within-sceneTSR: 0.19 -> 0.72Helped
use GC-VAT instead of D-VATDAT · cross-sceneCR: 37 -> 176Helped
use GC-VAT instead of D-VATDAT · cross-sceneTSR: 0.19 -> 0.57Helped
use GC-VAT instead of D-VATDAT · cross-domainCR: 35 -> 213Helped
use GC-VAT instead of D-VATDAT · cross-domainTSR: 0.19 -> 0.67Helped
add wind perturbationsGC-VAT · DAT citystreet-foggyTSR: less than 0.06 dropHurt
add simulated rainGC-VAT · DAT within-scene, cross-scene, and cross-domainTSR: less than 0.07Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: VOT DTB70 UAVDT

Benchmarks: DAT

Metrics: cumulative reward (CR) tracking success rate (TSR) correct action rate (CAR)

Baselines: AOT D-VAT

Builds on: PPO D-VAT AOT webots SUMO

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy