atlas

Research map / Detection and segmentation / Open-set and few-shot detection

EZSR: Event-based Zero-Shot Recognition

CVPR 2025 · Detection and segmentation › Open-set and few-shot detection · approach: Zero-shot segmentation and detection · 3 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Trains an event encoder (initialized from EVA-02-CLIP ViT-B/16) to align event embeddings with frozen CLIP image embeddings using a contrastive loss plus a scalar-wise modulation loss, trained on ~180M synthetic event frames generated from static RGB images via affine motion and V2E.

Problem

Zero-shot object recognition on event camera data is hampered by spatially sparse event embeddings that cause misalignment between event and CLIP text embedding spaces, and by scarce paired event-RGB training data.

Approach

Adds a scalar-wise modulation loss that penalizes per-dimension deviations between event and paired RGB embeddings, weighted by how similar each event embedding is to other events, plus a synthetic event data pipeline that warps static RGB images with random translation, scaling, and rotation and converts them to events with V2E.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Add scalar-wise modulation to the baseline objective (ablation)EZSR event encoder · N-ImageNetaccuracy: 9.57 -> 47.84Helped
Add reference-dataset embedding translation (Remark 1) to the baseline (ablation)EZSR event encoder · N-ImageNetaccuracy: 9.57 -> 43.48Helped
Add Remark 1 embedding translation to scalar-wise modulation (ablation)EZSR event encoder · N-ImageNetaccuracy: 47.84 -> 48.63Helped
Remove the baseline contrastive loss while retaining scalar-wise modulation (ablation)EZSR event encoder · N-ImageNetaccuracy: 48.86 -> 47.80No clear effect
Train on the in-domain N-ImageNet training set instead of the synthetic dataset (ablation)EZSR event encoder · N-ImageNetaccuracy: 47.84% vs. 54.36%Helped
Fine-tune using synthetic event data and CC3M text data (ablation)EZSR event encoder · N-ImageNetaccuracy: 47.84% -> 14.84%Hurt
Increase the number of synthetic training examples (ablation)EZSR event encoder · N-ImageNetaccuracyHelped
Train for more epochs, up to the reported saturation point (ablation)EZSR event encoder · N-ImageNetaccuracyHelped
Scale the CLIP image-encoder backbone and inference computation (ablation)EZSR event encoder · N-ImageNetaccuracyHelped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: synthetic event data from RGB images (around 180M RGB images from multiple sources) N-ImageNet CC3M

Benchmarks: N-ImageNet N-Caltech101 CIFAR-10-DVS N-MINIST HARDVS DailyAction PAF Bullying10K UCF101-DVS

Metrics: accuracy

Baselines: EventBind ECLIP EventCLIP ECDP MEM EARSNN PSN

Builds on: CLIP InfoNCE EventBind EventCLIP V2E

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy