atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Recognition and long-tail

Data Distributional Properties As Inductive Bias for Systematic Generalization

CVPR 2025 · Label-efficient and robust learning › Recognition and long-tail · approach: Data augmentation and generalization bias · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Shows that training-data distributional properties (color diversity, burstiness, latent intervention) induce systematic generalization in a small multimodal Transformer on a CLEVR-like masked-language task, linked to lower NMI and greater representational parallelism.

Problem

Deep networks fail at systematic generalization to unseen combinations of latent attributes, and the role of training data distributional properties as inductive biases for SG in multimodal models is understudied.

Approach

Treats data distribution properties (diversity of attribute values, burstiness limiting values per image, and random latent intervention) as inductive biases, and explains their effect via NMI between attributes and the parallelism (p-score) of learned representations.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Increase training color diversity from 8 to 216 colorsTransformer encoder · CLEVR-style test-OOD (shape)accuracy: 89% absolute increaseHelped
Use 216-color training data with only 25% of the original training size (ablation)Transformer encoder · CLEVR-style test-OOD (shape)accuracyHelped
Limit the number of colors available in each training imageTransformer encoder · CLEVR-style test-OOD (shape)accuracy: up to 14.8%Helped
Limit the number of colors available in each training imageTransformer encoder · CLEVR-style test-OOD (color)accuracy: up to 14.3% declineHurt
Randomly alter color hue during trainingTransformer encoder · CLEVR-style test-OOD (shape)accuracy: up to 15%Helped
Increase training dataset size for the 8-color baseline (ablation)Transformer encoder · CLEVR-style test-OOD (shape)accuracyHurt
Reduce the residual stream dimension of the 8-color baseline (ablation)Transformer encoder · CLEVR-style test-OOD (shape)accuracyHurt
Increase the residual stream dimension of the 216-color model (ablation)Transformer encoder · CLEVR-style test-OOD (shape)accuracyNo clear effect
Increase color diversity (ablation)Transformer encoder · CLEVR-style test-OOD (color)accuracy: ⇠6%Mixed
Increase color diversity (ablation)Transformer encoder · CLEVR-style test-OOD (material and size)accuracyHelped
Increase burstiness (ablation)Transformer encoder · CLEVR-style test-OOD (material and size)accuracy: at most 1% gainNo clear effect
Increase latent intervention on color (ablation)Transformer encoder · CLEVR-style test-OOD (material and size)accuracy: up to 2%Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: CLEVR-like synthetic dataset generated with CLEVR code

Benchmarks: CLEVR-like systematic split (in-distribution and out-of-distribution)

Metrics: accuracy p-score NMI DCI disentanglement DCI completeness

Baselines: 8-color baseline model

Builds on: CLEVR Chan et al. burstiness in-context learning Abbe et al. NMI and systematic generalization in CLIP p-score parallelism metric

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy