atlas

Research map / Detection and segmentation / Weakly supervised detection and segmentation

CSC-PA: Cross-image Semantic Correlation via Prototype Attentions for Single-network Semi-supervised Breast Tumor Segmentation

CVPR 2025 · Detection and segmentation › Weakly supervised detection and segmentation · approach: Consistency regularization for segmentation · 4 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes CSC-PA, a single-network semi-supervised BUS tumor segmentation framework with foreground and edge prototype attentions plus a pixel affinity loss, reporting SOTA on BUSI and UDIAT.

Problem

Semi-supervised breast ultrasound tumor segmentation suffers from scarce labels, variable lesion scale/shape, and ambiguous boundaries; mean-teacher methods learn only within-image correlations and depend heavily on the teacher.

Approach

A single-network semi-supervised framework that transfers foreground information across labeled and unlabeled images via channel-prototype attention (FPA), enhances lesion edges with an adaptive edge container and edge prototype (EPA), and enforces consistency of pixel affinity matrices between predictions and supervision (PAL).

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Add FPA (ablation)CSC-PA · BUSI 1/4Dice: 71.49±2.27 -> 76.20±2.73Helped
Add FPA (ablation)CSC-PA · UDIAT 1/4Dice: 74.78±2.44 -> 78.79±3.35Helped
Add EPA to FPA (ablation)CSC-PA · BUSI 1/4Dice: 76.20±2.73 -> 76.48±2.75Helped
Add EPA to FPA (ablation)CSC-PA · UDIAT 1/4Dice: 78.79±3.35 -> 80.29±1.68Helped
Add PAL to the supervised baseline (ablation)CSC-PA · BUSI 1/4Dice: 71.49±2.27 -> 74.19±3.09Helped
Add PAL to the supervised baseline (ablation)CSC-PA · UDIAT 1/4Dice: 74.78±2.44 -> 75.91±3.96Helped
Use random edge-feature selection and linear-layer container updating instead of top-k selection and memory-bank updating (ablation)CSC-PA · UDIAT 1/4Dice: 80.28±1.55 -> 81.26±1.75Helped
Use random rather than top-k edge-feature selection with memory-bank updating (ablation)CSC-PA · UDIAT 1/4Dice: 80.28±1.55 -> 79.95±1.80Hurt
Use a linear layer rather than a convolutional layer for edge-container updating with top-k selection (ablation)CSC-PA · UDIAT 1/4Dice: 80.45±2.22 -> 81.26±1.75Helped

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: BUSI UDIAT

Benchmarks: BUSI UDIAT

Metrics: Dice IoU

Baselines: U2PL AugSeg ABD CISC-R PS-MT UniMatch CorrMatch MFMSNet DK-HRS PH-Net

Builds on: Deeplabv3+ UniMatch CorrMatch mean-teacher

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy