atlas

Research map / Video / Video-language understanding

Adapting to the Unknown: Training-Free Audio-Visual Event Perception with Dynamic Thresholds

CVPR 2025 · Video › Video-language understanding · approach: Event and anomaly reasoning in video · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes AV2A, a training-free, open-vocabulary audio-visual event perception method that adds score-level fusion and within-video dynamic thresholds (label-shift estimation) on top of foundation models and existing weakly-supervised AVVP models.

Problem

Audio-visual event perception (temporal localization and classification of audio, visual, and audio-visual events) is limited to closed training vocabularies, relies on fixed thresholds that ignore temporal shifts in event distributions, and uses late fusion that loses multimodal interactions.

Approach

Replace late fusion with score-level fusion of audio and visual foundation-model scores, and replace static thresholds with per-video dynamic thresholds updated over time via a soft-confusion-matrix label-shift estimate scaled by cosine similarity of consecutive visual features, with no training.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Apply AV2A to CLIP + CLAPCLIP + CLAP · LLPType@AV segment: 22.1 -> 43.8 ± .04Helped
Apply AV2A to CLIP + CLAPCLIP + CLAP · LLPType@AV event: 19.5 -> 39.4 ± .01Helped
Apply AV2A to LanguageBindLanguageBind · LLPType@AV segment: 22.0 -> 52.4 ± .04Helped
Apply AV2A to LanguageBindLanguageBind · LLPType@AV event: 19.5 -> 47.5 ± .04Helped
Apply AV2A dynamic thresholdsCMPAE · LLPType@AV segment: 63.3 -> 63.6Helped
Apply AV2A dynamic thresholdsCMPAE · LLPType@AV event: 57.7 -> 58.0Helped
Apply AV2A to CLIP + CLAPCLIP + CLAP · AVEaccuracy: 38.2 ± 2.87 -> 68.5 ± 0.16Helped
Apply AV2A to LanguageBindLanguageBind · AVEaccuracy: 32.9 ± 1.27 -> 72.8 ± 0.14Helped
Add cosine similarity to label shift (ablation)AV2A (LanguageBind) · LLPType@AV segment: 52.3 -> 52.4No clear effect
Add cosine similarity to label shift (ablation)AV2A (LanguageBind) · LLPType@AV event: 47.3 -> 47.5No clear effect
Use dynamic rather than fixed thresholds (ablation)AV2A (LanguageBind) · LLPType@AV segment: 52.2 -> 52.4Helped
Use dynamic rather than fixed thresholds (ablation)AV2A (LanguageBind) · LLPType@AV event: 47.2 -> 47.5Helped

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: AVE LLP

Benchmarks: AVE LLP

Metrics: F1-score (segment and event level) Type@AV Event@AV accuracy

Baselines: CLIP+CLAP training-free baseline LanguageBind training-free baseline DG-SCT MGN-MA JoMoLD CMPAE

Builds on: BBSE label shift estimation CLIP CLAP LanguageBind multi-modal multiple instance learning

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy