atlas

Research map / Detection and segmentation / CNN features

A New Statistical Model of Star Speckles for Learning to Detect and Characterize Exoplanets in Direct Imaging Observations

CVPR 2025 · Detection and segmentation › CNN features · approach: Context for hard detection conditions · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes ExoMILD, a multi-scale convolutional statistical model of speckle nuisance (with rotational and spectral symmetries) embedded in an end-to-end learnable detection and flux-estimation framework for SPHERE exoplanet imaging.

Problem

Detecting and characterizing faint exoplanets in direct imaging, where quasi-static stellar speckles dominate the signal, with reliable statistically grounded detection scores and flux estimates.

Approach

Extends the PACO patch-based Gaussian nuisance model into a convolutional mixture of learnable distributions across multiple patch scales, with a learnable linear projection, N-fold rotational symmetry and spectral homothety modeling, and a UNet denoiser trained by Gaussian negative log-likelihood on the detection score.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use the proposed end-to-end method instead of PACOExoplanet detection in ASDI · Average across 5 test datasetsAUC: 0.693 ± 0.005 -> 0.761 ± 0.004Helped
Use the proposed end-to-end method instead of MODEL&COExoplanet detection in ADI · Average across 5 test datasetsAUC: 0.645 ± 0.005 -> 0.645 ± 0.005No clear effect
Use the proposed statistical model instead of PACOExoplanet flux estimation · 1,351 synthetic exoplanets detectable by both methodsARE: 0.56 -> 0.51Helped
Use the proposed statistical model instead of PACOExoplanet position estimation · 1,351 synthetic exoplanets detectable by both methodsRMSE: 0.21 -> 0.11Helped
Add N-fold rotational symmetries (N=1,2,4) (ablation)Proposed statistical model · ADIAUC: 0.554 ± 0.005 -> 0.575 ± 0.005Helped
Add multiple spatial scales through 64 × 64 patches (ablation)Proposed statistical model with N=1,2,4 symmetries · ADIAUC: 0.575 ± 0.005 -> 0.581 ± 0.005Helped
Add N-fold rotational symmetries (N=1,2,4) (ablation)Proposed statistical model · ASDIAUC: 0.713 ± 0.005 -> 0.723 ± 0.005Helped
Add multiple spatial scales through 32 × 32 patches (ablation)Proposed statistical model with N=1,2,4 symmetries · ASDIAUC: 0.723 ± 0.005 -> 0.726 ± 0.005Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: SPHERE SHINE-F150 survey observations (220) SPHERE test datasets HD 159911, HD 216803, HD 206860, HD 188228, HD 102647 HR 8799 SPHERE observations

Benchmarks: SPHERE synthetic injections on 5 HD stars HR 8799 real data

Metrics: AUC absolute relative error (ARE) RMSE

Baselines: cADI KLIP/PCA PACO MODEL&CO

Builds on: PACO MODEL&CO ANDROMEDA KLIP/PCA

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy