atlas

Research map / Video / Video generation

Video Prediction by Modeling Videos as Continuous Multi-Dimensional Processes

CVPR 2024 · Video › Video generation · approach: Efficient video diffusion models · 6 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes Continuous Video Process (CVP), which models consecutive video frames as endpoints of a continuous interpolation process with a zero-noise-at-endpoints schedule and a diffusion-like variational objective, for video prediction on KTH, BAIR, Human3.6M and UCF101.

Problem

Video prediction with diffusion models usually treats videos as independent images and relies on external temporal constraints such as temporal attention, which is costly; sampling also requires many steps.

Approach

Treat the transition between consecutive frames as a continuous interpolation process x_t=(1-t)x+ty+noise with g(t)=-t log t, which vanishes at both endpoints, and learn the reverse process with a simplified loss that predicts the endpoint y; no temporal attention is used.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use CVP instead of RIVERKTH video prediction · KTH, 30 predicted framesFVD: 180 -> 140.6Helped
use CVP instead of Grid-keypointsKTH video prediction · KTH, 40 predicted framesFVD: 144.2 -> 120.1Helped
use CVP instead of VDMBAIR video prediction · BAIR, 1 context frame, 15 predicted framesFVD: 66.9 -> 70.1Hurt
use CVP instead of MCVDBAIR video prediction · BAIR, 2 context frames, 14 predicted framesFVD: 87.9 -> 68.2Helped
use CVP instead of MCVDBAIR video prediction · BAIR, 2 context frames, 28 predicted framesFVD: 118.4 -> 95.1Helped
use CVP instead of Grid keypointHuman3.6M video prediction · Human3.6M, 30 predicted framesFVD: 166.1 -> 144.5Helped
use CVP instead of RaMViDUCF101 video prediction · UCF101, 16 predicted framesFVD: 356 -> 245.2Helped
predict 1 frame at a time instead of 2 (ablation)CVP · BAIR, 2 context frames, 14 predicted framesFVD: 68.2 -> 65.1Helped
predict 1 frame at a time instead of 2 (ablation)CVP · BAIR, 2 context frames, 28 predicted framesFVD: 95.1 -> 85.1Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: KTH BAIR robot pushing Human3.6M UCF101

Benchmarks: KTH BAIR Human3.6M UCF101

Metrics: FVD PSNR SSIM

Baselines: SVG-LP SAVP MCVD SLAMP SRVP RIVER Struct-vRNN Grid-keypoints DVG CCVS RaMViD FitVid

Builds on: denoising diffusion probabilistic models InDI Cold diffusion MCVD

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy