atlas

Research map / 3D vision / Human pose estimation

Unsupervised Learning of Category-Level 3D Pose from Object-Centric Videos

CVPR 2024 · 3D vision › Human pose estimation · approach: Category-level object pose estimation · 2 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Learns category-level 3D pose estimation from casually captured object-centric videos without human labels by aligning videos via a cyclic 3D geometry-plus-DINOv2-feature distance and training a neural-mesh correspondence model.

Problem

Category-level 3D object pose estimation normally needs human pose labels, CAD models, or RGB-D input; the paper targets learning it unsupervised from casual object-centric videos and predicting pose from a single image.

Approach

A weighted 3D cyclical-distance alignment of coarse video reconstructions with self-supervised DINOv2 surface features aligns videos into a canonical frame; the aligned meshes then supervise a vMF-based neural mesh correspondence model with render-and-compare pose fitting.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use the proposed weighted 3D alignment instead of UCD+CO3D unsupervised alignment · CO3D, 20 categoriesAcc. 30°: 69.8% to 77.0%Helped
use the proposed in-the-wild pose estimator instead of ZSPCategory-level pose estimation · PASCAL3D+, 7 categories30° accuracy: 46.0 to 69.2Helped
use the proposed in-the-wild pose estimator instead of ZSPCategory-level pose estimation · ObjectNet3D, 20 categories30° accuracy: 42.2 to 52.4Helped
replace render-and-compare pose inference with neural network regression (ablation)Ours · PASCAL3D+30° accuracy: 69.2 to 66.0Hurt
replace render-and-compare pose inference with neural network regression (ablation)Ours · PASCAL3D+15° accuracy: 41.3 to 25.8Hurt
replace render-and-compare pose inference with neural network regression (ablation)Ours · ObjectNet3D30° accuracy: 52.4 to 44.5Hurt
replace render-and-compare pose inference with neural network regression (ablation)Ours · ObjectNet3D15° accuracy: 25.5 to 16.4Hurt
tune appearance weight α and cyclical-distance temperature τ (best setting α = 0.2 and τ = 100) (ablation)Unsupervised alignment · CO3D alignment30° accuracy: 75.2%Helped
use render-and-compare pose inference instead of neural network regressionOurs · ObjectNet3Dseconds per sample: 10.92 seconds to 0.22 secondsHelped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: CO3D PASCAL3D+ ObjectNet3D

Benchmarks: CO3D PASCAL3D+ ObjectNet3D

Metrics: 30-degree accuracy 15-degree accuracy

Baselines: ZSP UCD+ TEASER++ StarMap VoGE Regression (6D rotation)

Builds on: DINOv2 Neural Mesh Models (NeMo) ZSP (Goodwin et al. zero-shot pose) Umeyama alignment RANSAC

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy