atlas

Research map / 3D vision / Human pose estimation

Towards Co-Evaluation of Cameras HDR and Algorithms for Industrial-Grade 6DoF Pose Estimation

CVPR 2024 · 3D vision › Human pose estimation · approach: Instance-level 6D object pose · 9 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces the Industrial Plenoptic Dataset (IPD) of 20 industrial parts captured by 13 cameras under varied lighting and exposures, plus a Robot Consistency evaluation method for sub-3mm 6DoF pose accuracy.

Problem

6DoF pose estimation lacks benchmarks and evaluation methods that measure industrial-grade (sub-millimeter) accuracy and jointly account for cameras, HDR, lighting, and polarization; annotated ground truth is too inaccurate at 150-200cm working distances.

Approach

Evaluate pose estimators by robot consistency: a calibrated robot moves a rigidly mounted object through many configurations, and predicted poses are compared against the robot-derived consensus pose (Fréchet mean) instead of noisy human annotations. Paired with a multi-camera, multi-modal, multi-exposure, multi-lighting dataset.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use a high-resolution multi-view camera setup (Basler HR) instead of the other evaluated cameraspose estimation pipeline · IPD, daylight, roomlight, and spotlightMVD: 3.078; 2.640; 3.061Helped
use Mertens HDR instead of no HDR (ablation)Basler-HR pose estimation pipeline · IPD, spotlightMedian MVD: 3.271 -> 3.061Helped
use Mertens HDR instead of no HDR (ablation)Basler-HR pose estimation pipeline · IPD, spotlightRecall: 0.72 -> 0.77Helped
use polarization (AOLP/DOLP) for edge refinement instead of no refinement modality (ablation)FLIR-MonoP pose estimation pipeline · Pipe FittingMedian MVD: 9.92 -> 8.43Helped
use polarization (AOLP/DOLP) for edge refinement instead of no refinement modality (ablation)FLIR-MonoP pose estimation pipeline · Oblong FloatMedian MVD: 6.17 -> 5.41Helped
evaluate poses with Robot Consistency instead of 1 mm-jitter annotationspose-estimator evaluation · synthetic scenesmean absolute difference (mm): 0.13 for our method vs. 0.47 mm for 1 mm jitterHelped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Industrial Plenoptic Dataset (IPD)

Benchmarks: Industrial Plenoptic Dataset (IPD)

Metrics: MVD recall precision ADD correlation with true performance

Baselines: Debevec HDR Robertson HDR Mertens HDR Basler-LR Basler-HR FLIR-MonoP Photoneo

Builds on: ADD metric Mask-RCNN Mertens exposure fusion edge refinement (Choi et al.) robot consistency (Kalra et al. prior work)

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy