atlas

Research map / Video / Video segmentation and tracking

Learned Scanpaths Aid Blind Panoramic Video Quality Assessment

CVPR 2024 · Video › Video segmentation and tracking · approach: Video restoration with temporal priors · 4 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes an end-to-end optimized blind panoramic video quality assessment method that pairs a learned probabilistic GMM scanpath generator (trained by minimizing expected code length) with a planar VQA model over differentiable viewport sequences.

Problem

Blind panoramic video quality assessment (PVQA) must account for diverse, uncertain user viewing behaviors (scanpaths) and the spherical structure, but existing scanpath methods rely on human scanpaths or optimize the scanpath generator separately from the quality predictor.

Approach

A probabilistic scanpath generator (GMM over relative uv coordinates, trained by expected code length) is made differentiable via Gumbel-softmax and reparameterization, so it is jointly fine-tuned with any planar VQA model; panoramic images are handled as videos of identical frames.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use learned scanpaths with the Assessor360 quality assessorAssessor360 · VRVQWSRCC: 0.779 -> 0.822Helped
Use learned scanpaths with the Assessor360 quality assessorAssessor360 · CVIQDSRCC: 0.955 -> 0.972Helped
Use learned scanpaths with the Assessor360 quality assessorAssessor360 · OIQASRCC: 0.946 -> 0.960Helped
Use learned scanpaths with Assessor360Assessor360 · OIQA → CVIQDSRCC: 0.859 -> 0.872Helped
Use learned scanpaths with Assessor360Assessor360 · CVIQD → OIQASRCC: 0.338 -> 0.703Helped
Vary scanpaths between training epochs instead of fixing them (ablation)Two-stage ScanpathVQA quality prediction · CVIQDSRCC: 0.710 -> 0.830Helped
End-to-end optimize the scanpath generator and quality assessor (ablation)Three-stage ScanpathVQA quality prediction · CVIQDSRCC: 0.830 -> 0.928Helped
End-to-end optimize the scanpath generator and quality assessor (ablation)Three-stage ScanpathVQA quality prediction · OIQASRCC: 0.798 -> 0.914Helped
Add visual context to the scanpath generator (ablation)Blind PVQA · VRVQWSRCC: 0.805 -> 0.816Helped
Add visual context to the scanpath generator (ablation)Blind PVQA · CVIQDSRCC: 0.928 -> 0.937Helped
Add visual context to the scanpath generator (ablation)Blind PVQA · OIQASRCC: 0.914 -> 0.925Helped
End-to-end optimize scanpath generation rather than optimizing it independently (ablation)Scanpath generator · VRVQWmaxTC: 0.781 -> 0.805Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: VRVQW CVIQD OIQA

Benchmarks: VRVQW CVIQD OIQA

Metrics: SRCC PLCC minOD maxTC

Baselines: NIQE MC360IQA Wen24 ScanpathVQA GSR-S GSR-X Assessor360

Builds on: expected code length scanpath modeling (Li et al. 2023) ScanpathVQA Assessor360 GSR Gumbel-softmax

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy