atlas

Research map / 3D vision / NeRF and radiance fields

GSNeRF: Generalizable Semantic Neural Radiance Fields with Enhanced 3D Scene Understanding

CVPR 2024 · 3D vision › NeRF and radiance fields · approach: Sparse-input NeRF regularization · 16 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes GSNeRF, a generalizable semantic NeRF that predicts source/target depth to guide sampling, jointly rendering novel-view RGB and semantic maps for unseen scenes.

Problem

Generalizable novel view synthesis combined with semantic segmentation for unseen scenes, where existing semantic NeRFs either require per-scene retraining or sample inefficiently and aggregate noisy features along rays.

Approach

A Semantic Geo-Reasoner predicts depth for each source view and aggregates them into a target-view depth map; this depth guides Gaussian-distributed sampling for volume rendering and a single surface-point query for semantic rendering, avoiding noisy off-surface points.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use depth-guided sampling and semantic rendering rather than uniform sampling with a pretrained 2D segmentor (ablation)GSNeRF · ScanNetPSNR: 28.48 -> 31.49Helped
Use depth-guided sampling and semantic rendering rather than uniform sampling with a pretrained 2D segmentor (ablation)GSNeRF · ScanNetmIoU: 37.88 -> 52.21Helped
Use depth-guided sampling for image rendering instead of uniform sampling (ablation)GSNeRF · ScanNetPSNR: 28.48 -> 30.56Helped
Add the semantic renderer instead of relying on a pretrained 2D segmentor (ablation)GSNeRF · ScanNetmIoU: 41.72 -> 49.47Helped
Use depth-guided sampling for semantic surface-point rendering instead of uniform sampling (ablation)GSNeRF · ScanNetmIoU: 49.47 -> 52.21Helped
Use depth-guided sampling for semantic surface-point rendering instead of uniform sampling (ablation)GSNeRF · ScanNetPSNR: 30.88 -> 31.49Helped
Use GSNeRF rather than S-Raygeneralizable semantic NeRFs · ScanNet, with GT depthmIoU: 55.53 -> 58.30Helped
Use GSNeRF rather than GeoNeRF + semheadgeneralizable semantic NeRFs · ScanNet, with GT depthPSNR: 32.55 -> 31.33Hurt
Train GSNeRF without GT depth, using self-supervised depth lossGSNeRF · ScanNetmIoU: 47.69 -> 52.21Helped
Train GSNeRF without GT depth, using self-supervised depth lossGSNeRF · ReplicamIoU: 43.27 -> 51.23Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: ScanNet Replica

Benchmarks: ScanNet Replica

Metrics: mIoU accuracy class accuracy PSNR SSIM LPIPS

Baselines: S-Ray GeoNeRF + semhead Neuray + semhead MVSNeRF + semhead GNT + semhead Semantic NeRF

Builds on: GeoNeRF Neuray S-Ray DS-NeRF RC-MVSNet

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy