atlas

Research map / 3D vision / NeRF and radiance fields

Learning Robust Generalizable Radiance Field with Visibility and Feature Augmented Point Representation

ICLR 2024 · 3D vision › NeRF and radiance fields · approach: Few-shot neural rendering architectures · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes Generalizable neural Point Field (GPF), a point-based alternative to image-based generalizable NeRFs, using visibility-oriented feature fetching, density-guided log sampling, and a feature-augmented learnable kernel.

Problem

Generalizable NeRFs built on image-based rendering suffer from occlusion-induced inconsistent feature matching, distortions at geometric discontinuities from independent per-point processing and rough feature aggregation, and degradation when source views are far from the target view.

Approach

Builds the generalizable neural field on a point scaffold (initialized by PatchmatchMVS) rather than image features, computes explicit geometric visibility scores from a point-density-derived depth prior to guide feature fetching, samples points nonuniformly in log-spaced positions around the estimated surface, and aggregates neighbor features with a learnable kernel augmented by neural features.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use GPF instead of the strongest listed baseline, Neuraygeneralizable radiance-field rendering · NeRF Synthetic generalizationPSNR: 27.07 -> 29.31Helped
Use GPF instead of Neuraygeneralizable radiance-field rendering · DTU generalizationPSNR: 25.94 -> 27.67Helped
Use GPF instead of Neuraygeneralizable radiance-field rendering · BlendedMVS generalizationPSNR: 23.24 -> 26.65Helped
Use GPF instead of Neurayfinetuned radiance-field rendering · NeRF Synthetic finetuningPSNR: 30.26 -> 33.28Helped
Use GPF instead of Neurayfinetuned radiance-field rendering · DTU finetuningPSNR: 29.15 -> 31.65Helped
Use GPF instead of Neurayfinetuned radiance-field rendering · BlendedMVS finetuningPSNR: 26.71 -> 28.78Helped
Add perturbation ε to log sampling (ablation)GPF sampling · DTU generalizationPSNR: 27.13 -> 27.67Helped
Replace coarse-to-fine uniform sampling with log sampling (ablation)GPF sampling · DTU generalizationPSNR: 26.56 -> 27.67Helped
Use log sampling instead of two surface samples (ablation)GPF sampling · DTU generalizationPSNR: 24.10 -> 27.67Helped
Use two-point surface sampling instead of log sampling (ablation)GPF sampling · DTU generalizationrendering time: 1.04s -> 0.62sHelped
Add the feature-augmented learnable kernel instead of inverse distance weights (ablation)GPF feature aggregation · DTU generalizationPSNR: 23.61 -> 27.67Helped
Add the feature-augmented learnable kernel instead of a radial basis kernel (ablation)GPF feature aggregation · DTU generalizationPSNR: 24.75 -> 27.67Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: DTU NeRF Synthetic BlendedMVS LLFF

Benchmarks: NeRF Synthetic DTU BlendedMVS LLFF

Metrics: PSNR SSIM LPIPS RMSE Acc.T training time rendering time

Baselines: IBRNet MVSNeRF ENeRF Neuray PointNeRF Point2Pix

Builds on: NeRF PointNeRF PatchmatchMVS IBRNet ENeRF

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy