atlas

Research map / Detection and segmentation / Open-set and few-shot detection

Exploring Orthogonality in Open World Object Detection

CVPR 2024 · Detection and segmentation › Open-set and few-shot detection · approach: Open-set and unknown object detection · 16 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes orthogonality-based open world object detection on RandBox: polar feature decomposition (magnitude for objectness, direction for class), a squared-correlation decorrelation loss, and a routed cross-task calibration layer for incremental learning.

Problem

Open world object detection suffers from low recall on unknown objects and misclassification of unknown objects into known classes, because objectness predictions are correlated with class information; incremental learning also causes interference with known classes.

Approach

Enforce orthogonality at three levels: decouple objectness (feature magnitude) and class (feature direction) via a polar coordinate decomposition, add a squared Pearson-correlation loss between objectness and class predictions, and use a Gumbel-routed task-specific affine calibration layer to keep orthogonality under incremental task changes.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Add feature orthogonalization (ablation)Base model · M-OWODB Task 1U-Recall: 8.4 -> 18.2Helped
Add feature orthogonalization (ablation)Base model · M-OWODB Task 1K-mAP: 59.8 -> 61.3Helped
Add prediction orthogonalization (ablation)Feature-orthogonalized detector · M-OWODB Task 1U-Recall: +6.4%Helped
Add feature and prediction orthogonalization (ablation)Base model · M-OWODB Task 1A-OSE: 5922 -> 4148Helped
Add cross-task calibration (ablation)Ours without calibration · M-OWODB Task 2U-Recall: +9.1%Helped
Add cross-task calibration (ablation)Ours without calibration · M-OWODB Task 2mAP (both): +1.1%Helped
Use the full orthogonalization method instead of the base modelRandBox base model · PASCAL VOC 10 + 10mAP: 69.8 -> 72.3Helped
Use the full orthogonalization method instead of the base modelRandBox base model · PASCAL VOC 15 + 5mAP: 72.4 -> 74.7Helped
Use the full orthogonalization method instead of the base modelRandBox base model · PASCAL VOC 19 + 1mAP: 73.4 -> 75.6Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: COCO PASCAL VOC M-OWODB S-OWODB

Benchmarks: M-OWODB S-OWODB PASCAL VOC incremental splits

Metrics: U-Recall mAP wilderness impact absolute open-set error

Baselines: ORE OST OW-DETR UC-OWOD ALLOW PROB CAT RandBox ILOD Faster ILOD Meta-ILOD ROSETTA

Builds on: RandBox ORE PROB Fast R-CNN Gumbel-Max trick

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy