atlas

Research map / Detection and segmentation / Open-set and few-shot detection

UMB: Understanding Model Behavior for Open-World Object Detection

NeurIPS 2024 · Detection and segmentation › Open-set and few-shot detection · approach: Open-set and unknown object detection

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes UMB, a method for open-world object detection that models text-attribute probabilities on OWL-ViT to detect unknown objects and explain which known classes and attributes drive the unknown predictions.

Problem

Open-world object detection methods recall unknown objects but do not explain why the model predicts them as unknown; the paper aims to understand the model's behavior when predicting the unknown class.

Approach

Model the relation between text-attribute similarity and positive-sample probability (empirical probability via Gaussian/Weibull mixture fitting), combine it with in-distribution and out-of-distribution probabilities to score unknowns, and then infer the most similar known class and the most influential attribute for each unknown prediction.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use UMB-Gm-L instead of FOMO-LOWL-ViT-L/14 · RWD Overall Task1 unknown categoriesmAP: 15.2 -> 20.5Helped
use UMB-Gm-L instead of FOMO-LOWL-ViT-L/14 · RWD Overall Task2 unknown categoriesmAP: 27.4 -> 32.7Helped
add in-distribution probability to mean embedding and OOD probability (ablation)UMB unknown inference · RWD OverallUAP (mAP): 9.7 -> 15.5Helped
add in-distribution probability to mean embedding and OOD probability (ablation)UMB unknown inference · RWD AerialUAP (mAP): 4.8 -> 3.8Hurt
add empirical probability to in-distribution and OOD probabilities (ablation)UMB unknown inference · RWD OverallUAP (mAP): 15.5 -> 20.5Helped
use Gaussian rather than Weibull distribution fitting (ablation)UMB · RWD OverallUAP (mAP): 19.3 -> 20.5Helped
use Weibull rather than Gaussian distribution fitting (ablation)UMB · RWD SurgeryUAP (mAP): 24.5 -> 25.6Helped
add linear interpolation to the original distribution (ablation)UMB probability mixture modeling · RWD OverallmAP: 18.3 -> 18.4No clear effect
use sliding-window filtering on the original distribution (ablation)UMB probability mixture modeling · RWD OverallmAP: 18.3 -> 18.4No clear effect
vary balance parameter α (ablation)UMB unknown inference · RWD unknown-category recallrecallNo clear effect

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: RWD (Aquatic, Aerial, Game, Medical, Surgery)

Benchmarks: RWD

Metrics: mAP unknown mAP (UAP) unknown recall (URE)

Baselines: FOMO Base+GT Base-FS OW-DETR ORE

Builds on: OWL-ViT FOMO ORE OW-DETR

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy