atlas

Research map / Vision-language and multimodal / Cross-modal learning

Dispel Darkness for Better Fusion: A Controllable Visual Enhancer based on Cross-modal Conditional Adversarial Learning

CVPR 2024 · Vision-language and multimodal › Cross-modal learning · approach: Multi-modality image fusion · 30 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes DDBF, a controllable visual enhancer that uses cross-modal conditional adversarial learning to brighten low-light visible images guided by infrared contrast, then fuses them with infrared images using explicit information preservation and hue fidelity losses.

Problem

Infrared and visible image fusion at night suffers from weakened visible information in low light, causing information mismatch, texture/contrast loss from multi-objective weighting, and color distortion from the YCbCr color separation strategy.

Approach

Uses infrared images' light-invariant contrast as the target illumination distribution for a CGAN whose condition is an enhancement ratio (built from gamma-augmented infrared samples), enabling controllable low-light enhancement without reference images; the fusion module replaces weighted multi-modal losses with max-based explicit preservation losses and a cosine-based hue fidelity loss.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
remove illumination adversarial loss (ablation)DDBF GRM · AGLIESSIM: 0.706 -> 0.405Hurt
remove low-pass filtering (ablation)DDBF GRM · AGLIESSIM: 0.706 -> 0.123Hurt
replace CGAN with conventional GAN (ablation)DDBF GRM · AGLIESSIM: 0.706 -> 0.526Hurt
remove hue fidelity loss (ablation)DDBF IFM · LLVIPVIF: 0.499 -> 0.483Hurt
replace significant contrast loss with multi-modal weighted-game loss (ablation)DDBF IFM · LLVIPAG: 9.150 -> 6.165Hurt
replace sharpened texture loss with multi-modal weighted-game loss (ablation)DDBF IFM · LLVIPMI: 2.904 -> 2.773Hurt
use YCbCr color separation strategy (ablation)DDBF IFM · LLVIPVIF: 0.499 -> 0.408Hurt
replace maximum integration with mean integration (ablation)DDBF IFM · LLVIPMI: 2.904 -> 2.904No clear effect
use DDBF rather than the strongest listed baselineInfrared-visible fusion · RoadSceneMI: 2.467 -> 3.288Helped
use DDBF rather than the strongest listed baselineInfrared-visible fusion · RoadSceneAG: 6.708 -> 5.451Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: LLVIP ExDark AGLIE MFNet RoadScene

Benchmarks: ExDark AGLIE LLVIP MFNet RoadScene

Metrics: NIQE PIQE SSIM PSNR MI VIF AG SD precision recall

Baselines: BPDHE SRIE RetinexDIP RUAS SCI DenseFuse IFCNN RFN-Nest U2Fusion SDNet

Builds on: conditional GAN Retinex theory explicit information preservation loss

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy