atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Molecules and proteins

CaDeT: a Causal Disentanglement Approach for Robust Trajectory Prediction in Autonomous Driving

CVPR 2024 · Probabilistic and scientific modeling › Molecules and proteins · approach: Multimodal trajectory prediction · 26 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes CaDeT, a causal disentanglement trajectory predictor on a dynamic heterogeneous graph that uses uncertainty-driven latent interventions and a variance-based invariance loss to improve robustness to spurious correlations.

Problem

Learning-based trajectory prediction for autonomous driving overfits to spurious correlations and is brittle under small perturbations and distribution shifts.

Approach

Disentangle causal and spurious spatiotemporal patterns with attention masks over a DyHIN scene graph, simulate distribution shifts by intervening on spurious features using uncertain feature statistics sampled from mini-batch variance, and penalize the variance of prediction loss across interventions to focus on causal patterns.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
add causal disentanglement to the DyHIN baseline (ablation)DyHIN trajectory prediction · AGV2 validationminADE6: 0.93 -> 0.88Helped
add same-timestamp spatial intervention with causal disentanglement (ablation)DyHIN trajectory prediction · AGV2 validationminADE6: 0.93 -> 0.77Helped
add same-agent temporal intervention with causal disentanglement (ablation)DyHIN trajectory prediction · AGV2 validationminADE6: 0.93 -> 0.75Helped
use uncertainty-driven intervention instead of random pattern replacement (ablation)CaDeT · AGV2 validationminADE6: 0.80 -> 0.71Helped
use CaDeT instead of QCNet†AGV2 motion forecasting · AGV2 leaderboardminFDE6: 1.19 -> 1.24Helped
use CaDeT instead of Forecast-MAEtrajectory prediction under adversarial perturbations · AGV2 validation, d = 100%, targetedPRS: 78.51 -> 87.59Helped
use CaDeT instead of Forecast-MAEtrajectory prediction in an unseen domain · AGV2 unseen test domainminADE6: 0.897 -> 0.638Helped
use CaDeT instead of MTRtrajectory prediction after removing non-causal agents · WOMD validation, Trained-AllPRS: 80 (%) -> 92 (%)Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Argoverse-2 motion forecasting Waymo Open Motion Dataset

Benchmarks: Argoverse-2 motion forecasting leaderboard Waymo Open Motion Dataset causal annotations

Metrics: minADE6 minFDE6 b-minFDE6 MR6 minADE1 minFDE1 MR1 mAP perturbation resistance score (PRS)

Baselines: THOMAS MTR GANet GoRela FRM QCNet ProphNet Forecast-MAE HPTR HDGT Multipath++ SceneTransformer

Builds on: DyHGT invariant risk minimization style variance penalty PointNet Forecast-MAE

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy