atlas

Research map / 3D vision / Face and shape

3D Face Reconstruction with the Geometric Guidance of Facial Part Segmentation

CVPR 2024 · 3D vision › Face and shape · approach: 3D morphable face model regression · 37 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes Part Re-projection Distance Loss (PRDL), which turns facial part segmentation into 2D point sets and matches anchor-based statistical distances to improve 3DMM reconstruction, especially for extreme expressions, and releases a synthetic expression dataset and a Part IoU benchmark.

Problem

3DMM-based 3D face reconstruction struggles with extreme expressions because landmark and photometric supervision are sparse or inaccurate, and renderer-based segmentation (silhouette IoU) losses suffer from local optima and unstable gradients.

Approach

Convert the segmentation of each facial part and the re-projected 3D mesh into 2D point sets, then compare grid-anchor-based statistical distances (nearest, furthest, average) between the two point sets, yielding a loss with clear gradients that avoids differentiable silhouette rendering.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
add PRDL (ablation)Ours · Part IoU benchmarkPart IoU average (%): 72.08 -> 73.82Helped
add PRDL (ablation)Ours · REALY frontal-view3D error average (mm): 1.568 -> 1.436Helped
add PRDL (ablation)Ours · REALY side-view3D error average (mm): 1.528 -> 1.442Helped
add synthetic data (ablation)Ours · Part IoU benchmarkPart IoU average (%): 72.22 -> 73.82Helped
add synthetic data (ablation)Ours · REALY frontal-view3D error average (mm): 1.468 -> 1.436Helped
add synthetic data (ablation)Ours · REALY side-view3D error average (mm): 1.455 -> 1.442Helped
use synthetic emotional-expression data without PRDL (ablation)Ours · Part IoU benchmarkPart IoU average (%): 72.08 -> 72.22Helped
use PRDL without synthetic data (ablation)Ours · Part IoU benchmarkPart IoU average (%): 72.08 -> 72.22Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Dad-3dheads CelebA CelebAMask-HQ RAF-ML RAF-DB 300W MEAD REALY

Benchmarks: Part IoU (MEAD subset) REALY

Metrics: IoU (%) 3D region error (mm)

Baselines: PRNet MGCNet Deep3D 3DDFA-v2 HRN DECA SoftRas DIB-R ReDA ICP chamfer distance

Builds on: 3DMM Deep3D DML-CSR SoftRas DIB-R

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy