AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Prediction and decision losses

On the Distribution of Minima in Intrinsic-Metric Rotation Averaging

CVPR 2020 · Learning theory and algorithms › Prediction and decision losses · approach: Consistency of surrogate losses · 8 citations (OpenAlex)

Check your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
increase graph connectivity (Watts-Strogatz rewiring) from row 1 to 3Rotation averaging landscape · Synthetic 40-node graphsease of finding dominant minimum: lambda2 4.6 -> 8.2Helped
increase connectivity further from row 3 to row 4Rotation averaging landscape · Watts-Strogatz graphsdifficulty: lambda2 8.2 -> 9.5No clear effect
increase noise level sigma_nRotation averaging landscape · Synthetic graphsnumber of distinct local minimaHurt
use more edges in Gnm graph (200 -> 400 edges)Rotation averaging landscape · Gnm n=40landscape messiness: lambda2 4.2 -> 12.0Helped
fewer edges (m=200) vs m=240Rotation averaging landscape · Gnm n=40landscape messiness: lambda2 9.5 -> 4.2Hurt
use random initialization at low noiseLevenberg-Marquardt · Watts-Strogatz row 3 column 1success rate: 97.5%Helped
rely on alpha_max certificate to predict difficultyEriksson et al. bound · Gnm graphsagreement with observed difficulty: alpha_max 20.2 -> 12.0 as connectivity risesHurt

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy