atlas

Research map / Detection and segmentation / CNN features

Speed/Accuracy Trade-Offs for Modern Convolutional Object Detectors

CVPR 2017 · Detection and segmentation › CNN features · approach: Region-based and query-based detectors · 2,699 citations (OpenAlex)

Check your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Choose SSD rather than R-FCN or Faster R-CNNObject detectors · COCO, images of size 300mAP points per millisecond of GPU computationHelped
Use SSD with MobileNetObject detectors · Large objectsmAP points per millisecond of GPU computation: about 0.9 mAP points per millisecondHelped
Use MobileNet as the feature extractorObject detectors · Almost all settingstotal memory usage: less than 1GbHelped
Use conv5 features instead of conv4 features (ablation)SSD with ResNet-101 · COCOmAPNo clear effect
Use conv5 features instead of conv4 features (ablation)SSD with ResNet-101 · COCOcomputational costHurt

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy