Research map / 3D vision / Face and shape
Shape Analysis With Hyperbolic Wasserstein Distance
Check your idea against 108,967 papers
AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.
Measured effects reported in the paper
| What was changed | Where | Measured | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| Use hyperbolic Wasserstein distance instead of cortical surface area | Cortical shape classification with the complex tree classifier · ADNI1 baseline, AD vs healthy controls | classification rate: 41.7% -> 76.7% | Helped |
| Use hyperbolic Wasserstein distance instead of cortical surface volume | Cortical shape classification with the complex tree classifier · ADNI1 baseline, AD vs healthy controls | classification rate: 51.7% -> 76.7% | Helped |
| Compare happier and angry expressions against the same happy-face template | Hyperbolic Wasserstein distance · BU-3DFE facial expressions | hyperbolic Wasserstein distance: 25.94 vs 11.75 | Mixed |
Closest papers by meaning
- Stereographic Spherical Sliced Wasserstein Distances (ICML 2024 · similarity 0.84)
- Tree-Wasserstein Distance for High Dimensional Data with a Latent Feature Hierarchy (ICLR 2025 · similarity 0.84)
- An in depth look at the Procrustes-Wasserstein distance: properties and barycenters (ICML 2025 · similarity 0.84)
- Wasserstein Wormhole: Scalable Optimal Transport Distance with Transformer (ICML 2024 · similarity 0.84)
- A New Robust Partial p-Wasserstein-Based Metric for Comparing Distributions (ICML 2024 · similarity 0.84)
- Diffeomorphic Mesh Deformation via Efficient Optimal Transport for Cortical Surface Reconstruction (ICLR 2024 · similarity 0.84)
Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.