atlas

Research map / Point clouds / Shape and surface completion

Diffeomorphic Mesh Deformation via Efficient Optimal Transport for Cortical Surface Reconstruction

ICLR 2024 · Point clouds › Shape and surface completion · approach: Unsupervised shape correspondence · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes DDOT, a diffeomorphic neural-ODE mesh deformation network trained with a sliced Wasserstein loss on meshes represented as oriented varifolds, and applies it to cortical white-matter surface reconstruction from MRI.

Problem

Chamfer-based set comparisons for learning mesh deformation lack guarantees on point-cloud sample size, are only pseudo-metrics, have quadratic cost, and get trapped in local minima, which hurts cortical surface reconstruction.

Approach

Represent meshes as probability measures (continuous, empirical, or discrete oriented varifolds) and compare them with sliced Wasserstein distance, which is a valid metric with linear memory and O(m log m) cost, inside a neural-ODE diffeomorphic deformation model.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use oriented varifold instead of point sampling with SWD (ablation)DDOT · ADNI Left WMEMD: .850 -> .728Helped
use oriented varifold instead of point sampling with SWD (ablation)DDOT · ADNI Right WMEMD: .832 -> .702Helped
replace CD with SWD on oriented varifold (ablation)DDOT · ADNI Left WMSWD: .499 -> .420Helped
replace CD with SWD on oriented varifold (ablation)DDOT · ADNI Right WMSWD: .529 -> .365Helped
replace Sinkhorn with SWD on oriented varifold (ablation)DDOT · ADNI Left WMEMD: 1.023 -> .728Helped
replace Sinkhorn with SWD on oriented varifold (ablation)DDOT · ADNI Right WMEMD: 1.002 -> .702Helped
use DDOT instead of CortexODEcortical surface reconstruction · ADNI and OASIS WM surfacesSI (%): .013 $\pm .011$ -> $\boldsymbol{<10^{-4}}$ (ADNI Left WM); .004 $\pm .005$ -> $\boldsymbol{<10^{-4}}$ (ADNI Right WM); .Helped
use DDOT instead of CortexODEcortical surface reconstruction · TRTSWD: .358 $\pm .275$ -> .403 $\pm .184$Hurt
use DDOT instead of CortexODEcortical surface reconstruction · TRTEMD: .799 $\pm .038$ -> .780 $\pm .032$Helped
use DDOT instead of CortexODEcortical surface reconstruction · TRTASSD: .241 $\pm .040$ -> .229 $\pm .010$Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: ADNI OASIS TRT

Benchmarks: ADNI OASIS TRT

Metrics: EMD SWD ASSD Chamfer normals self-intersection face ratio

Baselines: DeepCSR Vox2Cortex CFPP CortexODE FreeSurfer Sinkhorn divergence

Builds on: Neural ODE CortexODE CorticalFlow Sliced Wasserstein distance oriented varifold

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy