AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Detection and segmentation / Open-set and few-shot detection

Do Computational Models Differ Systematically From Human Object Perception?

CVPR 2016 · Detection and segmentation › Open-set and few-shot detection · approach: Visual relationship and scene graph detection · 35 citations (OpenAlex)

Check your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Fit the CNN's 100 principal-component features to human dissimilarity dataCNN (VGG-16) · Human perceived object dissimilarityexplainable variance explained: 55.1% -> 62.6%Helped
Combine the distances from 19 models using a weighted sumComputational models of object perception · Human perceived object dissimilarityexplainable variance explained: 62.6% -> 68.1%Helped
Use image pairs with greater symmetryComputational models compared with human perception · Object-pair dissimilarityresidual error (observed minus predicted)Hurt
Use image pairs with a larger object-area ratioIndividual computational models compared with human perception · Object-pair dissimilarityresidual error (observed minus predicted)Hurt
Use object pairs that share parts or other featuresComputational models compared with human perception · Object-pair dissimilarityresidual error (observed minus predicted)Mixed

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy