atlas

Research map / Graph learning / Graph self-supervised learning

Structure-Adaptive Multi-View Graph Clustering for Remote Sensing Data

AAAI 2025 · Graph learning › Graph self-supervised learning · approach: Multi-view graph clustering · 24 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes SAMVGC, a structure-adaptive multi-view graph clustering framework for remote sensing data that refines superpixel anchor graphs in embedding space and treats central and confusing samples differently via contrastive and consistency losses.

Problem

Multi-view clustering of remote sensing data with GNN methods relies on a fixed predefined graph that contains noisy background connections, and confusing boundary samples compromise cluster compactness.

Approach

Adaptively refine the anchor adjacency matrices using similarity in the learned embedding space, fused with previous graphs, and split samples into central and confusing groups: prototype contrastive learning on central samples and KL-based intra/inter-view consistency learning on confusing samples.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use SAMVGC instead of the strongest reported baselineRemote-sensing multi-view clustering · TrentoACC: 93.90±1.97 -> 95.04±0.36Helped
use SAMVGC instead of the strongest reported baselineRemote-sensing multi-view clustering · MUUFLACC: 48.23±4.21 -> 50.50±1.50Helped
use SAMVGC instead of the strongest reported baselineRemote-sensing multi-view clustering · AugsburgACC: 52.70±2.61 -> 67.80±0.20Helped
use SAMVGC instead of the strongest reported baselineRemote-sensing multi-view clustering · MDSAACC: 40.56±3.84 -> 47.59±0.70Helped
add graph spatial correlation adaptive refinement (ablation)SAMVGC · Trento; MUUFL; Augsburg; MDSAACC: 92.89 -> 95.04; 46.58 -> 50.50; 65.11 -> 67.80; 45.58 -> 47.59Helped
add central-sample contrastive learning loss (ablation)SAMVGC · Trento; MUUFL; Augsburg; MDSAACC: 87.07 -> 95.04; 42.59 -> 50.50; 64.34 -> 67.80; 44.98 -> 47.59Helped
add confusing-sample consistency learning loss (ablation)SAMVGC · Trento; MUUFL; Augsburg; MDSAACC: 93.16 -> 95.04; 46.17 -> 50.50; 66.89 -> 67.80; 46.24 -> 47.59Helped

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Trento MUUFL Augsburg MDAS

Benchmarks: Trento MUUFL Augsburg MDAS

Metrics: ACC Kappa NMI ARI PUR

Baselines: FMVACC AWMVC AMKSC MFLVC MDC CVCL SDMVC GCFAgg TMPCC MDFL CMSCGC

Builds on: SLIC superpixels graph convolutional networks prototype contrastive learning K-means

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy